Fish Story: The Plymouth Barracuda (Part One)

If you ask the average person to name an American sporty car of the late sixties, you probably won’t hear “Plymouth Barracuda” unless the person is a dedicated Mopar fan. In a way, that’s curious, because the Barracuda was the first of the so-called pony cars to hit the market (even before the Ford Mustang) and in some areas it was arguably superior to its Ford rival. So, why was the Barracuda doomed to be a perennial also-ran? This is the sad story of the 1964-1969 Plymouth Barracuda.



The early sixties were not an auspicious time for Chrysler’s Plymouth brand. Only a few years earlier, Virgil Exner’s handsome “Forward Look” Plymouths had stolen styling leadership from General Motors, while their buttoned-down “Torsionaire” suspension had set new standards for big-car handling. A ’57 Plymouth with the right engine was one of the fastest, most roadworthy cars in America. Sadly, it was all downhill from there, as quality-control problems, a propensity for early corrosion, and a succession of questionable styling decisions savaged its image and reputation. To make matters worse, in 1962, a serious intelligence failure led Plymouth’s big cars to be hastily downsized to what were then intermediate proportions, accompanied by styling that seemed to have come straight from the Bizarro World.

Plymouth’s only saving grace was the compact Valiant, its rival to Chevrolet’s Corvair and the Ford Falcon. The Valiant never sold as well as its Ford or Chevy rivals, but it kept many a Chrysler-Plymouth dealer afloat during a very lean time.

1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet front 3q
Until the introduction of the Plymouth Barracuda in April 1964, the sportiest member of the Valiant family was the hardtop Signet. Introduced in 1962, it was redesigned with the rest of the Valiant line in 1963. The second generation’s styling is notably less odd than its predecessor’s. (This car’s Moon wheels are not stock.)

In better days, Plymouth was supposed to be a rival for Chevrolet and Ford, the third of the traditional “Low-Priced Three.” In basic hardware, it gave away little to its competitors, but its image was moribund. As the economy improved during the Kennedy era, buyers were again looking for sporty, exciting cars, not just basic transportation. At the time, Ford and Chevy each had a glamorous halo car — the Thunderbird and the Corvette — and Chevrolet had also reinvented its Corvair as a sporty compact. Plymouth, meanwhile, had nothing. Its big 413 cu. in. (6,771 cc) “Max Wedge” engine was a fearsome dragstrip and NASCAR competitor, but it wasn’t the sort of thing anyone but an amateur hot rodder would want to drive on the street and it did little to boost Plymouth’s image.

In 1963, Chrysler-Plymouth introduced the second-generation Valiant, which now included a sporty hardtop and convertible line called Plymouth Valiant Signet. Its sales, a shade over 40,000, weren’t a patch on Chevrolet’s Corvair Monza, but it was promising. Plymouth product planner Joe Strum ventured that there would probably be a market for something a little sportier than the Signet, which was still a fairly dowdy piece. A sleeker body would go particularly well with the small V8 engine planned for the 1964 Valiant. If they got it ready quickly enough, it could also beat out Ford’s Mustang, a new sporty car that was set to bow in the spring of 1964.

1965 Plymouth Barracuda backlight
The Plymouth Barracuda’s backlight, developed in partnership with Pittsburgh Plate Glass, was the largest single piece of glass ever used in a production automobile, 2,074 square inches (1.34 square meters). It was tinted to cut down on solar heat gain. The extra weight of the glass made the Barracuda about 100 pounds (45 kg) heavier than a Valiant hardtop.


Designers Irv Ritchie and Dave Cummins had developed a study for a fastback Valiant back in 1959, but it hadn’t gone anywhere. Their concept was dusted off and refined by stylist Milt Antonick to fit the new Valiant body. For time and cost reasons, the fastback was largely identical to the Valiant hardtop from the beltline down, but it added a massive, wraparound back window — a distinctive but distinctly polarizing styling feature.

After some internal argument, the new model was dubbed Plymouth Valiant Barracuda. Its floorpan, suspension, brakes, and most other components were off-the-shelf Valiant parts, including the new lightweight, 273 cu. in. (4,482 cc) V8. A three-speed manual transmission was standard, but a four-speed was optional, as was Chrysler’s excellent TorqueFlite automatic.

1965 Plymouth Barracuda rear 3q
The first-generation Plymouth Barracuda was 188.2 inches (4,780 mm) long on a 106-inch (2,692mm) wheelbase, 7.4 inches (188 mm) longer than a Mustang. With a V8 and automatic, the Barracuda weighed around 3,280 pounds (1,490 kg). Like all mid-sixties Chrysler cars, it has independent front suspension with torsion bar springs and a live axle in back. This car’s streamlined “Moon” wheels are not stock. (Photo © 2003 Don Kasak; used with permission)

Nobody was particularly happy with the Barracuda’s obvious resemblance to the workaday Valiant, but there was no money for anything more novel. Even if there had been more money, Plymouth management wanted the Barracuda to be ready as quickly as possible so they could beat the Mustang to market.

The Barracuda did indeed beat the Mustang, albeit only by 16 days — bowing, perversely enough, on April Fool’s Day 1964. To no one’s great surprise, it performed much like a Valiant. That wasn’t bad, but it was hardly very sporting. Nor was it all that quick. With the base six-cylinder engine, 0-60 mph (0-97 km/h) took around 14 seconds, with a top speed of around 95 mph (153 km/h). The V8 cut the 0-60 mph times to around 11 seconds and lifted top speed to just over 100 (162 km/h). The V8 put the Barracuda on a par with Chevrolet’s turbocharged Corvair Monza Spyder, but it was still inferior to either of the two optional 289 (4,728 cc) V8s available on the Ford Mustang.


Chrysler-Plymouth seemed unsure exactly how to market the Plymouth Barracuda. Was it a sporty car like the Mustang or was it a handy utility car for campers and sportsmen? As an unnamed Plymouth executive told an understandably perplexed Car and Driver editor (who offered the possibly embellished transcript in the magazine’s May 1964 issue), the division thought the Barracuda would appeal to both audiences. It should be said that product planning and marketing executives make whole careers of attempting to have their cake and eat it too, but the point of specialty cars is to offer a level of conceptual focus that mainstream family cars necessarily lack, so such mixed messages were worrisome. Station wagon utility is no bad thing, but it’s hardly a quality calculated to arouse lust in buyers longing for a sporty car.

The division’s ambiguity might not have been a problem if the Ford Mustang had never existed, but it did. Moreover, Ford had so clearly delineated the Mustang’s marketing mission that it left the erstwhile Plymouth rival looking hapless and confused. Indeed, the haziness of the Barracuda’s image quickly became perhaps its most crippling problem.

1965 Plymouth Barracuda front view
Standard engine in the Plymouth Barracuda was the Valiant’s Slant Six. In 1964, the 101 horsepower (75 kW) 170 (2,790 cc) version was standard, but for 1965, it was replaced by the bigger 225 cu. in. (3,682 cc) engine with 145 gross horsepower (108 kW). The optional V8 was Chrysler’s LA-series 273 cu. in.(4,482 cc) engine with 180 gross horsepower (134 kW). From 1965 to 1967, the optional Barracuda Formula S engine upped the ante to 235 horsepower (175 kW).

With awkward looks, average performance, and unfocused marketing, the Barracuda caused no anxiety for Ford salesmen. The fastback Plymouth sold 23,443 units in its short 1964 season, worse than the previous year’s Valiant Signet; the Mustang outsold the Barracuda by more than five to one. Being first, it turns out, is no great advantage if nobody notices.


The Plymouth Barracuda’s performance got a much-needed boost in 1965. Chrysler engineer Scott Harvey, who moonlighted as an SCCA rally champion, developed a new Formula S option package based on the modifications previously made to the Valiant and Dodge Dart rally cars. The package included a hotter version of the 273 engine, rated at 235 gross horsepower (175 kW), and beefed up the Barracuda’s handling with stiffer springs, firmer shocks, faster steering, and wider tires.

With the Formula S engine and the optional four-speed manual transmission, the Barracuda could run from 0-60 mph (0-97 km/h) in around eight seconds and reach a top speed of 115 mph (185 km/h). Its handling was also much improved. The Formula S still lost its cool on rough pavement, but on smooth roads it was a rival for some contemporary European sports cars. The main handicap was the steering; the non-power setup was much too slow, while the power steering was fast but utterly numb. Still, all in all, it was now a good performance match for the Mustang, although it was still slower than a Mustang “Hi-Po.”

Sadly, the Formula S package did nothing for the Barracuda’s gawky appearance. Reviewers had no kind words for the gaudy (but mercifully optional) racing stripes or the Formula S package’s peculiar-looking wheel covers.

While Barracuda sales for 1965 were up to a more respectable 64,596, the Mustang now outsold it by almost nine to one. In 1966, the swan song for the original design, sales were even worse — only 38,029 Plymouth Barracudas went out the door that year compared to 607,568 Mustangs.

1965 Plymouth Barracuda rear view
Other than the big rear window, the first-generation Plymouth Barracuda’s other great party trick was a fold-down rear seat, a novelty in this era. It wasn’t nearly as versatile as a modern hatchback and its usefulness was somewhat limited by the exposed and vulnerable fuel filler in the left side of the trunk, but its 7-foot (2.1-meter) load floor was well suited to hauling skis, camping equipment, or surfboards. More than a few Barracuda owners slept in the back of their cars on camping trips or long journeys.


With such uninspiring sales, Plymouth might ordinarily have considered killing the Barracuda entirely, but the division managers were not about to relinquish their one toehold into the lucrative compact specialty car market. In the fall of 1964, stylists got to work on the second-generation car, which finally debuted in late November 1966 as a 1967 model. Booming Mustang sales convinced the corporation that it was worth investing the money to give the Plymouth Barracuda its own identity, separate from the Valiant — which is what Strum and Antonick had wanted in the first place.

1968 Plymouth Barracuda side view
The 1967-1969 Plymouth Barracuda was 192.8 inches (4,897 mm) long on a 108-inch (2,743mm) wheelbase, making it several inches longer than the original model. It was also 1.6 inches (41 mm) lower. Note the tiny side marker lights, hastily added to comply with 1968 U.S. federal safety standards.

Although the new Plymouth Barracuda still shared the basic A-body platform of the Valiant, all sheet metal was now unique. The new Barracuda was a few inches longer and wider than before: 192.8 inches (4,897 mm) long and 71.6 inches (1,819 mm) wide on a 108-inch (2,743mm) wheelbase. Again styled by Milt Antonick, it was far less clumsy-looking than its predecessor and it offered a choice of three different body styles rather than just one. There was still a fastback, now with a smaller, more conventional rear window, but there was also a convertible and a sleek, notchback hardtop.

1968 Plymouth Barracuda rear 3q view
Unlike the Mustang, whose hardtop body style was always the best seller, buyers of the second-generation PlymouthBarracuda preferred the fastback by a slim margin. The fastback weighed about 85 pounds (39 kg) more than the hardtop and cost roughly $200 more.

You could still order the Formula S package in 1967, although the 235 hp (175 kW) engine was starting to feel a little over-matched by the new body, which was more than 100 pounds (45 kg) heavier than before. Originally, Plymouth planned to offer the bigger 318 cu. in. (5,204 cc) V8, but then they learned that Ford was going to offer its 390 cu. in. (6,391 cc) big-block engine as an option in the redesigned 1967 Mustang. That was a challenge Plymouth didn’t want to ignore, so engineers shoehorned Chrysler’s big-block 383 cu. in. (6,276 cc) engine under the Barracuda’s hood.

Putting big blocks into pony cars was a bit of marketing one-upsmanship, but it was never a particularly good idea. Even with the optional heavy-duty components, the suspensions of these cars were never that well balanced to begin with and adding an extra 200-300 (90-135 kg) pounds over the front wheels did ugly things to weight distribution. The big engine was a tight squeeze for the Barracuda’s engine bay, leaving no room for a power steering pump. With 280 gross horsepower (209 kW), the 383 was naturally faster than the 273, but was also a good deal clumsier, and the manual steering made it tiresome to maneuver or park.

1968 Plymouth Barracuda front view
The second-generation Plymouth Barracuda’s engine bay was 2 inches (51 mm) wider than before, but the optional 383 cu. in. (6,276 cc) engine and its bulky exhaust manifolds were still a tight squeeze. Power steering wasn’t available with the 383 until 1969, air conditioning was never offered, and changing spark plugs was best accomplished with telekinesis. This 1968 Barracuda fastback has the basic 318 cu. in. (5,204 cc) V8 and TorqueFlite, a far more sensible if less speedy combination.

Fortunately, help was in store for 1968. The Slant Six was still standard, but the 273 was dropped completely in favor of a new 318 cu. in. (5,204 cc) V8 with 230 gross horsepower (172 kW). A new alternative was the 340 cu. in. (5,567 cc) LA-series V8 with a conservative 275 gross horsepower (205 kW). The 340 was as almost strong as (if not stronger than) the 383, but was about the same size and weight as the 318, making it a much better fit for the Barracuda’s engine bay.

The 340 and 383 were still far from the most powerful engines Plymouth built. A few 1968 Barracudas — perhaps as many as 75 — had the monstrous 426 Hemi (6,974 cc) engine crammed under their hoods. The Hemi-powered cars were sold without warranties, bound solely for the dragstrip. It was just as well, since a Barracuda with 760 pounds (345 kg) of Hemi stuffed into the nose would not have been a pleasant prospect for street driving.

1969_Plymou1969 Plymouth Barracuda hardtop rear 3q view
Designer Milt Antonick said the second-generation Plymouth Barracuda’s styling was inspired by contemporary European designs as well as Raymond Loewy’s Studebaker Avanti, but the overall proportions are reminiscent of the second-generation Chevrolet Corvair hardtop. Eschewing the popular long-hood/short-deck proportions of the Mustang didn’t do the Barracuda’s sales any favors. Note the slight S-curve of the C-pillars and the concave shape of the rear window.


With better styling, more powerful engines, and higher performance, you’d think the second-generation Plymouth Barracuda would’ve sold much better, but Plymouth continued to eat the Mustang’s dust. It was also outpaced by the new Chevrolet Camaro, Pontiac Firebird, and Mercury Cougar.

Plymouth gamely tried a few more tricks for 1969, including making power steering available for the 383 cu. in. (6,276 cc) engine, offering an optional 440 cu. in. (7,206 cc) engine (which proved even more unwieldy than the 383), and adding a new budget-muscle model called ‘Cuda, which included the Formula S suspension and 340 cu. in. (5,567 cc) V8 engine as standard equipment. It was to little avail — the Barracuda barely managed to edge out AMC’s Javelin, let along its Ford and Chevy competitors. The best year of this generation, 1967, was actually a little lower than the peak sales of the first-generation Barracuda.

1969 Plymouth Barracuda 340-S engine
The 340 cu. in. (5,567 cc) V8, part of the same “LA” series as the 273 and 318, was introduced in 1968. Radically oversquare with big valves and a hot cam, its 275 gross horsepower (205 kW) rating was very conservative — the National Hot Rod Association “factored” it to more than 300 horsepower (223 kW) for racing classification purposes. It was a thirsty engine, but a 340-powered Barracuda was capable of 0-60 mph (0-97 km/h) in around seven seconds and the quarter mile in the 14s, with trap speeds around 95 mph (153 km/h). With proper gearing, top speed was more than 125 mph (201 km/h). (Photo © 2008 Dave G.; used with permission)

In some ways, that failure was unfair. The 1967-1969 Plymouth Barracuda might not have been the best-looking pony car, but it was hardly an eyesore and it no longer looked like a Valiant. The 340-S and ‘Cuda offered handling and performance to match most rivals. The Barracuda had its foibles, but so did every other car in its class.

The real problem was that later Barracudas were undone by the confused marketing and ambiguous image of the original car. Thanks to Lee Iacocca’s all-fronts media assault, everyone knew what a Mustang was supposed to be from day one. That push gave it a momentum that Ford rode through every subsequent generation, even as the car itself drifted further and further from the original concept. Chrysler-Plymouth’s marketing department, however, had never seemed to decide quite what it was selling, an ambivalence that compounded handicaps like the oddball styling.

1969 Plymouth Barracuda 340-S badge
The 340-S and 383-S were the final incarnation of the original, sporty Plymouth Barracuda Formula S. Developed by rally champion Scott Harvey, the Formula S package included a heavy-duty suspension, quick steering, and fatter tires. A Barracuda so equipped had excellent handling by the standards of contemporary American cars, at least on smooth pavement. It was relatively rare — in 1969, only 1,839 340-S models were sold, most (1,431) of them fastbacks like this one. The 383-S accounted for a mere 718 cars. (Photo © 2008 Dave G.; used with permission)

In retrospect, Plymouth might have been better off abandoning the Barracuda name and coming up with a different moniker for the second-generation car. In that case, the Mustang’s head start would probably still have limited Plymouth’s market penetration (just as it did GM’s late-to-the-party Camaro and Firebird), but the car wouldn’t have had as much baggage to overcome.

As we’ll see in our second installment, Plymouth took the Barracuda concept in two different directions for 1970, each with quite different results.

# # #


Our sources for the development of the Barracuda and Duster included the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide, Encyclopedia of American Cars: Over 65 Years of Automotive History, (Lincolnwood, IL: Publications International, 1996); Arch Brown, “1965 Plymouth Barracuda,” Special Interest Autos #82 (July-August 1984), reprinted in The Hemmings Book of Plymouths: driveReports from Special Interest Autos magazine, eds. Terry Ehrich and Richard A. Lentinello (Bennington, VT: Hemmings Motor News, 2002), pp. 102-109, and “1970 ‘Cuda Six-Pack: Plymouth’s Prancing Pony,” Special Interest Autos #98 (March-April 1987), reprinted in The Hemmings Motor News Book of Chrysler Performance Cars: driveReports from Special Interest Autos magazine, eds. Terry Ehrich and Richard A. Lentinello (Bennington, VT: Hemmings Motor News, 2000), pp. 108-115; Jeffrey I. Godshall, “In with the New: The 1963-66 Plymouth Valiant Story,” Collectible Automobile Vol. 26, No. 4 (December 2009), pp. 50–63; Bob McMay, “Barracuda! Fleet fastback on Valiant chassis,” Motor Trend May 1964, pp. 26-27; Curtis Redgap, “Duster: The Plymouth That Almost Wasn’t,”, 2004, www.valiant. org/ duster.html, accessed 2 October 2008; and Paul Zazarine, Barracuda and Challenger (Muscle Car Color History) (Osceola, WI: Motorbooks, International, 1991).

Road tests we consulted for this story included Bob McVay, “Valiant Barracuda Road Test,” Motor Trend August 1964, pp. 40-43, and “Rally Packed Barracuda,” Motor Trend January 1965, pp. 38-43; John Etheridge, “Sporty Specialties: Mustang, Camaro & Barracuda,” and “Sporty Cars: Special Packages,” Motor Trend May 1967, pp. 28-33 and 41-42; and Julian Schmidt, “The Barracuda 383,” Motor Trend September 1967, pp. 52-53; “Plymouth Barracuda,” Car and Driver May 1964; Eric Dahlquist, “Formula S,” Hot Rod February 1965; “Barracuda S,” Car Life June 1965; “1966 Plymouth Barracuda,” Road & Track March 1966; “Barracuda Formula S,” Car and Driver June 1966; “One that gets away,” CAR September 1966; “Barracuda Formula S,” Auto Topics February 1967; “A Pair of Barracuda,” Car Life March 1967; “Mustang, Barracuda & Camaro,” Road & Track March 1967; “Plymouth Barracuda 383,” Car and Driver April 1967; “Autocar Road Test Number 2147: Plymouth Barracuda 4,473 c.c.,” Autocar 31 August 1967; “1968 Plymouth Barracuda 340-S,” Car Life December 1967; “1968 Barracudas: The International Viewpoint,” and Scott Harvey “Tame & Wild 1968 Barracudas,” Sports Car Graphic December 1967; “1969 ‘Cuda 340,” Car Life November 1967; Eric Dahlquist, “‘Cuda 340,” Motor Trend October 1968; Steve Kelly, “Barracuda on the Line,” Hot Rod December 1968; and “Biggest Engine Yet in a Ponycar— 440 ‘Cuda,” Car Life June 1969, all of which are reprinted in Plymouth Muscle Portfolio 1964-1971, ed. R.M. Clarke (Cobham, Surrey: Brooklands Books Ltd., 2003); and Ray Broc, “Barracuda,” Hot Rod July 1964; Jerry Titus, “Driver’s Report: Barracuda ‘Formula S,'” Sports Car Graphic March 1966; and “Barracuda,” Road Test February 1969, all of which are reprinted in Plymouth Muscle Portfolio 1964-1971, ed. R.M. Clarke (Cobham, Surrey: Brooklands Books Ltd., 2003).


Add a Comment
  1. “A ’57 Plymouth Fury with the right engine was one of the fastest, most roadworthy cars in America.”
    If I’m not mistaken, there was only one engine available in the 57 Plymouth Fury, a dual quad 318 rated somewhere around 290hp.

    1. You’re quite right — the first year for optional engines on the Fury was 1958. That really should just have been “a ’57 Plymouth with the right engine.” I’ve amended the text accordingly. Thanks!

  2. Im restoring a 1969 340-S fastback and Im ready for some rubber on the rims. What tires came standard for that model?

    thxs Scott

    1. According to contemporary magazine reviews, the standard size for the 340 cars was E70-14 on 14×5.5J wheels.


    1. ¿En cuál sentido?

  4. Since I owned five different MoPar vehicles, I guess you can call me one of those MoPar "fans" (wink,wink):

    1971 Dodge Charger 318/2BBL, 3A
    1970½ Plymouth AAR ‘Cuda 340/6BBL, 4M
    1968 Dodge Charger 383/2BBL, 3A
    1967 Barracuda 383 Formula S, 4M
    1965 Barracuda 273 Formula S, 4M

  5. I owned a 1966 Formula S Barracuda with a hopped up 273 V8. This car beat an AMX 390 handily. Naturally, big cubic inches such as the 426 Hemi, 440 6 Pack, 427 Rat, 427 side oiler and others were big at the top end. But for the first 60 feet, it was the small block leading the way. Had 3.91 Sure Grip rear end for extra mojo.

    I wish I still had that automobile.

  6. My favorite affordable car of the 1960s during my late teens/early twenties was the Barracuda 340. You could have a Mustang that handled like a greased pig on wet roads and scare the hell out of yourself with just a 225 hp/4 MT, how about a 289/271hp Comet Caliente that was even nuttier, both built on the, IMO, hopeless Falcon chassis, or the somewhat better Camaro based on the squidgy Chevy II platform.

    Well, Valiants and Darts had an almost bombproof cockroach-like ability to last even in rust-prone climes by comparison. So, a nice Barrauda 340 with Torqueflite flew under the radar and by just about anything else that didn’t have a big block, or rumpa-tum-tum idle like the 327/350 Chevy II which would veer off into the boondocks at full chat. Quite refined for the time, the 340 burbling up steep inclines with four passengers at 1400 rpm, then instantly going insane when there was a couple hundred yards of straight to pass that farmer holding you up in his pickup truck. No squirrelly rear-end, not even much rubber from a full throttle start. It just went. Properly.

    Most unusual for the times, a somewhat refined quick car that wasn’t a giant tub o’lard or a rackety bag o’ bolts. And forgotten as well. A pity.

  7. I read in "Dodge Challenger & Plymouth Barracuda: Chrysler’s Potent Pony Cars" by Peter Grist, that the 1967 Barracuda was designed by a combination of designers. John Herlitz did the 1967 Barracuda S-X fastback concept which was the basis of the ’67 ‘Cudas. He left when he was temporarily called to the National Guard so John (Dick) Samsen took over to develop the fastback design. He redid the front end and hood, and later designed an new notchback version, Antonick and Dave Cummins did the rear glass window in the fastback and rearend. The metal gas cap was the idea of Antonick, inspired from Triumph TR3s/4s.

    1. Although the article doesn’t go into the styling in any detail, that is my understanding of how it went.

  8. all i have to say is that all you people that post this shit dont no any thing and if the 383 was heavy in the front so was a camaro with a396 and a mustang with a 390 the only reason that they didnt sell was because mopar will never get what they have coming to them becauseall the test people are gm and ford i have a 383 cuda that blew the doors off alot of camaros and mustsngs so thats my story and im stickin to it

    1. @ Mark: I’m not sure with whom you’re disagreeing. Nobody (certainly not me) is going to argue that a Camaro 396 or Mustang 390 wasn’t just as nose heavy or unwieldy, or that a 383 Barracuda wouldn’t still outrun them in a straight line. The main edge the Camaro and Mustang had in that regard is that you could get the big engines with power steering, which didn’t make them nimble or well-balanced (and is small consolation to anyone who’s ever tried to change the plugs on a big-block Mustang of that vintage).

  9. Just a question did the 67-69 barracuda have a unibody or were they a ful frame car? Thanks for any reply!

    1. Eric> Like the A-body Valiant on which it was based, the Barracuda was unibody. The only post-1960 Chrysler car that wasn’t unitized was the Imperial, and only through 1966.

  10. How many 69 formula S barracudas were produced with a 383 4 speed in the notchback style in 69.

    1. Ninety-eight, I believe.

  11. I know I asked how many 69 barracudas were made formula S in 69 with the 383 engine & 4 speed with a 391 gear in a notchback. Thanks

    1. I have no idea — I’ve never seen a breakdown by axle ratio. Given the tiny number of 383 Formula S cars, obviously not many!

  12. how many 69 Barracuda Formula S with 383 4-speed in the fastback style were built ?

    1. I believe 331.

  13. How many 1966 Formula S were produced?

    1. That’s a good question. I’ve never seen a figure for that, I assume because the package was an option rather than a body style.

  14. have a question: we have a 67 cuda for 20 plus yrs now. We are trying to sell it and just ran the VIN #’s. The VIN runs the car as a 66 Dart. The tag says it was made in Canada. We have never made changes to the car except pull motor.. Does Canada VIN #s run different then VIN# in U.S.?


    1. I honestly don’t know, although that’s certainly possible, considering that the U.S. and Canadian lineups were different at that point. It’s an interesting question, but I don’t have anything to suggest.

      1. Thank you Aaron. I’ll keep researching

  15. Great article! I actually love reading about dismal sales figures since they translate directly to rarity. Towing my current project (a ’69 Fastback) across country turned so many heads I should have gotten kickbacks from chiropractors. People looked at it like they had never seen such a thing before and a few actually asked, "what is that?". Mine is still the only one I’ve laid eyes on in about 10 years. By the way, I was one of those nuts back in the 80s who were drawn by the utility of the Barracuda. I did, in fact, camp in the back of my old Fastback.

  16. Barracuda Formula "S" Production totals
    1965 Formula S quantity unknown
    1965 8 cyl 41,601
    V8 273 4bbl automatic 4,505
    V8 273 4bbl 4-speed 4,874
    1966 8 cyl 25,536
    Formula S w/ 273 4bbl Auto 2,346
    Formula S w/ 273 4bbl 4-speed 2,970
    1967 Formula S
    Formula S w/ 273 4bbl 5,352
    Formula S w/ 383 4bbl 1,784
    1968 Formula S
    Formula S w/ 340 4bbl 3,917
    Formula S w/ 383 4bbl 1,279
    My favorite is the first generation of Barracuda .
    I have a each year
    64 V8 273 push-button
    65 Formula S V8 Commando 273 4 Speed
    66 Recreation Formula S V8 273 Automatic

  17. I just bought a 67 Formula S Notch Back with a 383 automatic. How do I know that it is a Formula S or were all 383’s Formula S? Also how many 383 automatic Notch Backs made in 67?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Click here to read our comment policy. You must be at least 18 to comment and PLEASE DON'T POST COPYRIGHTED CONTENT YOU DON'T OWN!
Except as otherwise noted, all text and images are copyright © Aaron Severson dba Ate Up With Motor. All rights reserved.. Trademarks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners and are used here for informational/nominative purposes; this is not an official or authorized website of any automaker or other business entity.