Turbo Before Its Time: 1980–1986 BMW 745i (E23)

Summary

From 1980 to 1986, BMW offered a special turbocharged version of its flagship 7-Series sedan called the 745i. The turbocharged six-cylinder engine was supposed to be a more economical substitute for a 4.5-liter V-12 BMW developed in the 1970s, but its fuel consumption was still high, and it performed best at very high speeds. There was also a rare South African version with the normally aspirated (non-turbocharged) 24-valve six-cylinder engine from the M635CSi coupe. The 745i was not officially exported to the U.S. and sold in relatively small numbers. It was discontinued in 1986 and replaced by the 750i and 750iL, which had a non-turbocharged V-12 engine instead of the turbocharged six.

V-12 Return

Neither the turbocharged six nor the twin-cam M88 engine would return for the subsequent E32 7-Series line, as BMW began having second thoughts about the 745i even before the introduction of the M106 engine. The turbo six had been expedient and cheaper to build than a V-12 (although that wasn’t necessarily something one wanted to brag about in this rarefied class), but its fuel economy benefits had proven more notional than practical, and had come with too many compromises. It had developed a certain following — the 745i accounted for about 5.6 percent of all 1977–1986 E23 7-Series production, a respectable fraction, all things considered — but it appealed most strongly to a particular subset of existing BMW fans, which we suspect was simply not enough, given Von Kuenheim’s preoccupation with matching Mercedes-Benz.

In early December 1982, BMW engineers began serious work on a new V-12 engine. Development proceeded rapidly and in great secrecy: The design was mostly finalized by June 1983, and the first prototype engines were running on test stands that October. Dubbed M70, the new V-12 was based on the architecture of the latest M20B25 small six (although the commonality was primarily in production tooling and transfer equipment rather than in actual parts), but the block was aluminum rather than cast iron, keeping dry weight to 529 lb (240 kg), some 77 lb (35 kg) lighter than the stillborn 4.5-liter V-12, but only a few pounds lighter than a cast iron Chevrolet V-8. Many of the V-12’s components were identical between both banks, with each bank having its own distributor and Bosch Motronic injection system, which was obviously more expensive on a unit basis, but helped to reduce tooling costs. Like contemporary BMW small sixes, the M70 had single overhead camshafts (chain- rather than belt-driven) and only two valves per cylinder.

1992 BMW 750i engine bay with M70 V-12 engine (Herranderssvensson)

The 4,988 cc (304.4 cu. in.) M70 V-12 engine, seen here in a 1992 BMW 750i, was an imposing sight, although its specifications — single overhead cam per bank, two valves per cylinder — were nothing special by the standards of its time, nor was its 60 hp/liter specific output. (Photo: “TCM24 19 – BMW” by Herranderssvensson, which was dedicated to the public domain by the copyright holder under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication)

The M70 shared the M20B25 six’s bore and stroke, giving a total displacement of 4,988 cc (304.4 cu. in.). While the original goal was to match the stillborn 4.5-liter’s 272 PS (200 kW), the production M70 bettered its predecessor’s output by 10 percent, giving 300 PS (220 kW, 296 SAE net horsepower). Unlike the M102 and M106 engines, even the West German version had three-way catalytic converters with oxygen sensor feedback control. In the E32 7-Series, linked to a four-speed ZF 4HP24 automatic (the sole transmission offered), the V-12’s DIN standard fuel consumption was up to 25 percent higher than the M106-powered E23 745i, but BMW claimed that the short-wheelbase E32 750i was a half-second quicker to 62 mph (100 km/h) and 0.9 seconds quicker through the standing kilometer, with a much higher (and electronically limited) top speed of 155 mph (250 km/h). The first AMS full test of the long-wheelbase 750iL returned 15.2 mpg (15.5 L/100 km) overall, significantly better than the old 745i had ever managed, and on regular unleaded gasoline rather than leaded Super.

More importantly, the M70 finally allowed BMW to offer something on its senior models that Mercedes-Benz couldn’t yet match. The latest W126 560SEL had more displacement — 5,547 cc (338.4 cu. in.) — and nearly as much power (although the 5.6-liter Mercedes engine could only match the 300 PS (220 kW) of the BMW V-12 without catalytic converters — but the first Mercedes V-12 engine wouldn’t arrive until 1991, a small but no doubt satisfying moral victory in the ongoing war between Munich and Stuttgart. Moreover, the V-12 cars’ power and snob appeal could be appreciated even by customers who would never exceed 70 mph (112 km/h), and since they posed fewer packaging problems and were catalyzed even in West Germany, they could be certified for U.S. sale without undue difficulty.

E32 BMW 750iL (green) front3q (nakhon100)

About two-thirds of V-12 E32 7-Series sedans were the long-wheelbase 750iL, like this one, with wheelbase stretched from 111 to 116 inches (2,832 to 2,947 mm) for greater rear-seat legroom. The short-wheelbase 750i was dropped in some export markets (including the U.S.) early on, but remained available in Germany through 1994. E32 cars were far more aerodynamic than the E23, with drag coefficients as low as 0.32 (0.34 on V-12 cars). (Photo: “BMW 750iL E32” by nakhon100, which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license)

In a 1987 CAR comparison of ultra-high-end sedans, the acerbically erudite LJK Setright dismissed the 750iL as inferior to the 735i, “neither quieter nor sweeter … nothing more than a badge of rank among those for whom promotion is essentially stipendiary.” Nevertheless, the E32 750i and 750iL were far more commercially successful than the old 745i, accounting for 48,559 units through 1994 — 15.6 percent of E32 7-Series production. The V-12 returned for the E38 generation, now bored and stroked to 5,379 cc (328.2 cu. in.), becoming the M73. For the stylistically unfortunate E65 7-Series in 2002, BMW replaced the SOHC M73 with the all-new N73, this time a DOHC 48-valve engine displacing 5,972 cc (364.4 cu. in.).

Although most BMW diesel engines had long been turbocharged, BMW didn’t return to petrol turbocharging until 2006, beginning with the twin-turbo N54 six, first introduced in the E92 335i. Turbocharged engines were initially offered on the performance ends of the range, and gradually spread to include less-racy models. For the F01 7-Series in 2008, BMW followed the lead of Mercedes-Benz in turbocharging its latest V-12, dubbed N74, which now had twin Garrett turbos and 544 PS (400 kW). This engine returned for the subsequent G11, initially producing a whopping 610 PS DIN (449 kW) — over twice the output of the original normally aspirated M70. (A version of this engine remains in production for Rolls-Royce, although BMW finally dropped its own V-12 models in 2022.) The modern BMW lineup has become increasingly turbo-heavy, with the battery electric models now the sole exceptions.

1983 BMW 745i (E23) (Arctic Blue) nose badge with BMW roundel (Gregory Mazur)

(Photo copyright © 2024 Gregory Mazur; used with permission)

Today, more than 40 years on from the turbocharging renaissance that spawned the E23 745i, the technology has finally matured enough to pay off the promise suggested back then. With the addition of variable valve timing, direct injection, and more sophisticated engine controls, it’s now possible to produce tractable and relatively economical turbocharged street engines offering 100 or more horsepower per liter. This has made engine displacement a matter of diminishing importance, not least in the relationship between model designation and actual engine size. (Current BMW petrol models identified as “-30i” generally have 2-liter (121.9 cu. in.) turbo fours.)

BMW could have been ahead of the curve had they continued developing the turbo package beyond the M106 engine (which had made some useful strides in practicality), but it’s clear that the 745i was always more about corporate ego than efficiency or mechanical progress. With the advent of the V-12 750i, BMW finally had the prestige engine they’d wanted in the first place, and it sold well enough to make it seem like they had missed a bet with the E23. (The fact that the company clung to its 12-cylinder engines as long as it did is strong evidence that the snob appeal was not solely for the punters.)

Born of second-guessing, the E23 745i represented not so much a prelude of things to come as a novel example of a kind of car BMW doesn’t really make anymore: rare, eccentric, flawed, and as specialized as it was swift. It was not a car designed for mass appeal — even most 7-Series buyers of the time would have been happier with a 735i (particularly on U.S. roads) — but for those few who saw the point, the eccentricity was part of the trip.

FIN

NOTES ON SOURCES

Our sources included Alan Allard, Turbocharging & Supercharging (Wellingsborough, England: Patrick Stephens Limited, 1986); AR Test-Team, “BMW 745i (AR test 30-1980),” Automobil-Revue No. 41 (2 October 1980): 33, and “BMW 745i (AR test 38-1984),” Automobil-Revue No. 41 (4 October 1984): 17; “AutoTest: Mercedes-Benz 500SE: The best Mercedes ever,” Motor 11 October 1980: 24–29; Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Betriebsanleitung: 728i, 735i, 732i, 745i, 3rd edition (Munich, West Germany: BMW AG, 1983]; BMW Classic, “BMW 745i (E23),” bmw-grouparchiv. de/ irc/ resultlist/ detailpage?id=3845250, accessed 5 August 2024; BMW Presse, “BMW Engineering Conference 1983 (BMW Technik Tag 1983)” [engineering conference notes, March 1983], “BMW Programm 1980 (Presentation: 48. International Motor Show Frankfurt 1979)” [press kit, September 1979], “BMW Program 1981 (67. International Motor Show Paris 1980)” [press kit, October 1980], “Das BMW Programm für 1983” [press information summary, 16 August 1982], “BMW Programm 1984 (50. International Motor Show IAA Frankfurt 1983)” [press kit, September 1983], and “BMW Modelljahr 1985” [press information summary, 20 September 1984]; “BMW Preise PKW Programm” [German price and equipment lists, February 1982, 16 January 1984, 2 December 1985, and 4 August 1986], “Neue Preise ab 9.8.192 [German price list for 1983 models, 9 August 1982]; “Presseinformation BMW 745i” [press kit, 2 June 1980], “728i 732i 735i 735i Katalyst 745i” [German 7-Series brochure 611070110, January 1986]; and “Zusatzbetriebsanleitung in Verbindung mit der Fahrzeug-Betriebsanleitung (Airbag)” [owner’s manual supplements, 1985]; Clauspeter Becker, “Es hat zwölf geschlagen: Die Entiwicklungs-Geshichte des BMW-Zwölfzylinders,” auto motor und sport 15/1987 (18 July 1987): 14–23, and “Kopf oder Zahl (Doppeltest BMW M5 gegen BMW 750i),” auto motor und sport 26/1988 (15 December 1988): 24–27;; “BMW 745i: The ultimate Autobahn cruiser?” Road & Track Vol. 33, No. 7 (March 1982): 142–144; BMW (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd., “745i” [brochure 511070224, January 1985]; “Body building: Neu bei BMW: modifizierte Limousinen der Siebener-Reihe,” auto motor und sport 19/1979 (12 September 1979): 54; Russell Bulgin, “Power-Crazed,” Motor 8 September 1984, reprinted in BMW 7 Series Performance Portfolio 1977–1986, ed. R.M. Clarke (Cobham, England: Brooklands Books Ltd., 1999), 118–120; “Buying Secondhand: BMW 6 and 7 Series,” Autocar 9 July 1983, reprinted in BMW 7 Series Performance Portfolio 1977–1986, 104–107; Dirk-Michael Conradt and Gert Hack, “BMW gegen Mercedes,” auto motor und sport 6/1978 (15 March 1978): 48–59; Dirk-Michael Conradt and Götz Leyrer, “Deutsche Meiser: BMW gegen Mercedes (BMW und Mercedes im Vergleich: 728i gegen 280S, 732i gegen 280SE, 735i gegen 380SE und 745i gegen 500SE),” auto motor und sport 21/1980 (8 October 1980): 8–20, 74–88; Dev Dvoretsky, “Bee-Em’s Merc Matchers,” Modern Motor October 1979, reprinted in BMW 7 Series Performance Portfolio 1977–1986, 46–48; Johannes Emonts, assignor to Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, U.S. Patent No. 4,517,801, “Supercharging Pressure Control Device for Turbocharged Internal Combustion Engines,” filed 4 February 1983, priority date 4 February 1982, patented 21 May 1985; Adolf Fischer, assignor to Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, U.S. Patent No. 4,442,672, “Boost Control Device for Internal Combustion Engines with Exhaust Gas Turbocharger,” filed 11 June 1981, priority date 14 June 1980, patented 17 April 1984; Paul Frère, “BMW 745i v Mercedes 500 SE,” Motor 25 October 1980, reprinted in BMW 7 Series Performance Portfolio 1977–1986, 60; Gert Hack, “Der Gipfelstürmer (Test BMW 745i: Spitzenmodell mit größerem Motor und neuer Automatik),” auto motor und sport 18/1983 (7 September 1983): 50–54, and “Wer bietet mehr? (Test BMW 750i L: Luxus-Limousine mit langem Radstand und Zwölfzylindermotor),” auto motor und sport 18/1987 (29 August 1987): 10–16; Jim Hall, “BMW 745i: Rush with Hush; the ultimate Driving Machine,” Motor Trend Vol. 34, No. 3 (March 1982), reprinted in BMW 7 Series Performance Portfolio 1977–1986, 87–89; Kai Jacobsen, “The History of the BMW 7-Series,” ATZextra Vol. 13, No. 8 (14 November 2008): 9–13; Richard A. Johnson, Six Men Who Built the Modern Auto Industry (Osceola, Wis.: Motorbooks International, 2005); Dianna Jones, “BMW M30 Engine — The OG Bavarian Straight Six,” Bimmers.com, 17 July 2022, bimmers. com/ blog/ bmw-m30-engine-the-og-bavarian-straight-six/, accessed 27 October 2024, and “BMW N74 Engine – Known Issues and Common Problems,” Bimmers.com, 25 March 2025, bimmers. com/ blog/ bmw-n74-engine-known-issues-and-common-problems/, accessed 28 October 2024; Wolfgang König, “Das Flaggschiff (Fahrbericht 750i L),” auto motor und sport 15/1987 (18 July 1987): 8–13; “Eine Klasse für sich (Modell-Neuheit: Mercedes S-Klasse),” auto motor und sport 26/1990 (14 December 1990): 10–17; “Motoren-Werk (Fahrbericht 745i: Neues Spitzenmodell mit Turbomotor),” auto motor und sport 12/1980 (4 June 1980): 44–48; and “Verbrauchswunder (Test BMW 745i: BMW-Luxuslimousine mit verbessertem Turbomotor),” auto motor und sport 25/1981 (16 December 1981): 50–54; Karlheinz Lange, Burkhard Göschel, R. Henning, and F. Krame, BMW AG, “M 105 — A New Turbocharged IDI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 820114 (Warrendale, Pa.: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1982); Götz Leyrer, “Große Klasse (Test Mercedes 500 SEL: Top-Limousine der S-Klasse mit verlängertem Radstand und neuen Energiekonzept),” auto motor und sport 22/1981 (4 November 1981): 50–56; “S wie Super (Test Mercedes 380 SE und 500 SE: Neuer Maßstab in der Luxusklasse),” auto motor und sport 18/1980 (27 August 1980): 98; Hans-Harald Melzer and Wolf-Dieter Spindelböck, assignors to Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, U.S. Patent 4,555,904, “Arrangement of an Exhaust-Gas Return System for an Internal-Combustion Engine Having an Exhaust-Gas Turbosupercharger,” filed 10 July 1982, priority date 16 July 1981, patented 3 December 1985; “Munich’s Mauler,” CAR August 1982, reprinted in BMW 7 Series Performance Portfolio 1977–1986, 90–91; Paul Niedermeyer, “Automotive History: Michelin’s TRX Tire–Reinventing The Radial Tire Didn’t Work Quite As Well As Inventing It,” Curbside Classic, 17 December 2022, www.curbsideclassic. com/ automotive-histories/ automotive-history-michelins-trx-tire-reinventing-the-radial-tire-didnt-work-as-well-as-inventing-it/, last accessed 12 November 2024; Jan P. Norbye and the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide, BMW: Bavaria’s Driving Machines (Skokie, Ill.: Publications International, Ltd., 1984); Heinrich Sauer and Hans-Peter Seufert, “V-Männer: Die großen deutschen Motoren: Der BMW-Zwölfzylinder im Vergleich zu den V8-Motoren von Mercedes und Porsche,” auto motor und sport 4/1987 (14 February 1987): 8–16; Werner Schruf, “Turbinen-Werk (Fortsetzung der Titelgeschichte: Test BMW 745i: Neue Spitzen-Limousine aus München),” auto motor und sport 18/1980 (27 August 1980): 36–41; Graham Robson, BMW 7 Series: The Complete Story (Marlborough, England: The Crowood Press, 2001); Werner Schruf, “Die preiswerte Alternative (Doppeltest BMW 728i gegen 745i: Welcher bietet mehr fürs Geld?),” auto motor und sport 16/1984 (8 August 1984): 60–62; LJK Setright, “Setright decides,” CAR December 1987: 114–117; James Taylor, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, 1972–2023 (Ramsbury, England: The Crowood Press, 2015); Dan van der Vat, “Obituary: P Botha,” The Guardian 1 November 2006, www.theguardian. com/ news/ 2006/ nov/ 02/ guardianobituaries.southafrica, accessed 23 October 2024; Ron Wakefield, “BMW V-12: A sleeping giant that was never awakened,” Road & Track Vol. 31, No. 2 (October 1979): 51–52; Klaus Wießmann, “Lang und gut (Kurztest: Mercedes 450 SEL),” auto motor und sport 21/1976 (13 October 1976): 116–119; “When Money Doesn’t Matter,” CAR December 1987: 104–113; Jörg Wilhelmmy, “Rand-Erscheinung (Neues Modell: BMW 745i mit Vierventilmotor aus Südafrika),” auto motor und sport 15/1983 (27 July 1982): 32–37; and ZF Getriebe GmbH, “ZF 3 HP-22 Automatic Transmission for Passenger Cars” [brochure F 1/19 SL 7615 09e, n.d.]. Some details on modern BMW models came from Mark Wan’s BMW Car Archive, www.autozine. org/ Archive/ BMW/ BMW_archive.html, last accessed 28 October 2024.


RELATED ARTICLES


8 Comments

Add a Comment
  1. Isn’t the 2002 Turbo the first turbocharged BMW? Or is there some other qualification on first for the 7 series?

    1. Ack! I could try to claim there was some nuance there, but it was just a clumsy restructuring of the original lede. I’ve fixed it now, more correctly if no more gracefully.

  2. Superb as always

  3. One minor point I want to note preemptively is that there is some disagreement about the output of the abortive 4.5-liter V-12 of the seventies. Many contemporary press accounts describe it as having 275 hp (or 275 PS, in German sources). However, the German press kit for the launch of the 745i in June 1980 includes an appendix with some detailed information about the canceled V-12 engines, including power, torque, and fuel economy curves. That data unequivocally lists the V-12’s peak power output as 200 kW, which is 272 PS or 268 hp. So, how did that become 275 hp? My surmise is that someone did the metric-mechanical horsepower conversion in the wrong direction (there’s no such error in the press kit, but it might have become garbled in oral presentations), and a bunch of magazine editors did not catch the error; it would not be the first time I’ve seen that happen with mechanical and metric horsepower figures! This is a very, very minor point, but I wanted to mention it for the historical record.

  4. Marvellous write-up. Thank you. Is there any insight into why the M30B32 (3.2 litre) from the 732i was used as the basis for this engine rather than the M30B35LE (3.5 litre) from the 735i as both would seem to have fitted the timeline. I may be answering my own question here but the 3.5 litre used the M88 block so it could have been cost, or it wasn’t as well understood as the M30 block which had already been around for years. It was a very important question to a 10 year old at the time whose next door neighbour drove a 732i – why not use the most powerful engine you have as the starting point?

    1. BMW is vague on this point, but I think the most likely answer is that they were up against it on transmission torque capacity. The nominal input torque capacity of the 3HP22 was 320 N-m, so getting it to take the 380 N-m of the M102 was already a bit of a reach. (The V-12, which would have used the same transmission, had 365 N-m.) I would not be surprised if there were also concerns about radiator capacity with the increased power, and of course a turbocharged M30B35LE would have been even thirstier than the 3.2-liter M102, which was obviously a concern. By all appearances, the M102 was developed quite rapidly (in two years or less), and I suspect this resulted in pressure to not change any more of the rest of the powertrain any more than absolutely necessary. (I have an inkling that this also why the M102 didn’t have Motronic, although having integrated electronic spark control with a boosted engine was obviously desirable.)

  5. During Apartheid South Africa, there were so-called Bantustans aka homeland for the natives that were nominally “independent” (no one recognize it tho except for South Africa and probably Rhodesia). The leaders of those bantustans are black and most likely very rich, enough to buy a 745i. There is competitions from the three pointed stars and their Sonderklasse at that time, and maybe they, just like other leaders at that time (including F.W. Klerk, whom i heard was the owner of a 600 Grosser. Nelson Mandela also had a 1990 500SEL gifted by the workers at MBSA after he got released from Robben Island).

    1. The leaders of those bantustans are black and most likely very rich, enough to buy a 745i.

      Possibly so — there are limits to how far one can generalize these things. But, my understanding is that at the time the South African 745i was introduced, the E23 7er had become the favored executive car of the Botha government, both as a ministerial barge and as private cars for senior officials and the gold magnates who were playing a not insignificant role in propping up the apartheid state. I don’t assume MBSA had missed its opportunities to sell to the same market, but Botha himself favored the 7-Series, and the associations were very unsavory, even if not ALL the original 745i buyers were necessarily white.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments may be moderated. Submitting a comment signifies your acceptance of our Comment Policy — please read it first! You must be at least 18 to comment. PLEASE DON'T SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED CONTENT YOU AREN'T AUTHORIZED TO USE!