Blogads button

blog advertising is good for you
Longlife Button Banner

Editorials and Commentary

Find Us on Facebook

Sponsor icon
Customize you car with magnetic signs

Admin Login



Auto Parts Nerd

Search Ate Up With Motor

FTC Disclosure Notice


Paid advertising and sponsored links on Ate Up With Motor are identified with the words "Sponsor," "Sponsors," or "Sponsored Links." In the event we receive any other compensation or consideration for any content herein, the nature of that compensation will be disclosed on the final page of the article or content, or otherwise adjacent to it. See the Terms of Use for important additional information regarding Ate Up With Motor's advertising and commercial endorsements.


Designed by
SiteGround web hosting Joomla Templates
Supermini: The Autobianchi A112 Abarth Print E-mail

Tags: 1960s | 1970s | Abarth | Autobianchi | Fiat | Italian cars | supermini

Written by Aaron Severson   
Sunday, 15 March 2009 00:00

Many of our articles are inspired by the cars we spot in and around Los Angeles. Your author has encountered cars as diverse as a Bugatti Veyron, a Jaguar XJ12C, and a Fiat Multipla -- not at car shows or museums, but parked on the street or driving in traffic. Every so often, we run across something exotic enough that even we can't immediately identify it -- something like this.

1972 Autobianchi A112 Abarth side

We must admit that we didn't immediately recognize this little car, and it took some research to determine exactly what it was. Our first thought was that it was a Fiat of some kind, which was almost correct. In fact, it is a 1972 Autobianchi A112 Abarth 58HP, a mouthful of a moniker that bears some explanation.

1972 Autobianchi A112 Abarth front 3q
The A112 is a little bigger than a Mini, but not by much: 127.6 inches (3,240 mm) long on an 80.3-inch (2,040-mm) wheelbase, tipping the scales at a little over1,500 pounds (690 kg). It has disc/drum brakes, with unequal-length A-arms and coil springs up front, a dead axle on a transverse leaf spring in the rear. Its specification is rustic, but it works.

BIANCHI AND AUTOBIANCHI

If you have any interest in bicycles, you may recognize the name Bianchi, an Italian manufacturer of high-end racing bikes. Bianchi was founded in Milan in 1885, and holds the distinction of having offered the first bicycle in the world with pneumatic tires, back in 1888. What you may not know is that the following year, founder Edoardo Bianchi produced his first automobile, which went on sale in 1900. During the first world war, Bianchi produced military vehicles for the Italian army, returning to passenger-car production in 1919. Bianchi's cars were of high quality, but conventional design, and they were never produced in large numbers.

Like many automakers of the Axis nations, the Bianchi works were targets of Allied bombing during World War Two, leading to the near-total destruction of the company's factory in 1943. By 1946, Bianchi had returned to production, but its passenger-car lines were dropped, the company focusing instead on bicycles and commercial vehicles.

In 1955, industrialist Fernacio Quintavalle arranged a joint venture between Bianchi, Fiat, and the tire manufacturer Pirelli. The JV, dubbed Autobianchi SpA, produced upscale versions of Fiat cars, beginning with the 1957 Bianchina, which was based on the contemporary Fiat 500. Edoardo Bianchi's son, Giuseppe Bianchi, sold the family's interest in the joint venture to Fiat in 1958. In 1963, Autobianchi became a wholly owned subsidiary of Fiat.

Autobianchi's role in the Fiat lineup was akin to Honda's North American Acura division: a somewhat more expensive, more upscale brand, often used to try out new technologies before introducing them to the mainstream brand. For example, the Autobianchi Primula, which bowed in 1964, actually introduced the groundbreaking transverse-engine/front-wheel-drive layout used by the 1969 Fiat 128.

1972 Autobianchi A112 Abarth rear
The three-door hatchback layout was still a novelty in the late sixties and early seventies, but by the time Volkswagen's rival Golf debuted in 1975, it became de rigueur for subcompact cars. The A112 was available only in three-door form, but the Fiat 127 that shared its platform and body shell was also offered as a two- or four-door sedan. Fiat advertising claimed the 127 and A112 made 80% of the body available for passenger and cargo space.

REFINING THE FWD CONCEPT

A few years earlier, the BMC Mini had demonstrated the packaging advantages of a transverse engine and front-wheel drive. By consolidating the entire drivetrain into a single, compact unit, the rest of the body's volume is available for passenger space. The problem with that layout, however, was what to do with the transmission. Alec Issigonis, designer of the Mini, opted to mount the transaxle in the engine sump, sharing its oil supply. This was compact, but problematic; engines and transmissions have very different oiling requirements, and requiring them to share lubrication results in compromises that are satisfactory for neither.

Fiat engineers wanted the space advantages of a FWD layout, so they opted to offset the transversely mounted engine, with the transaxle mounted next to it, driving the front wheels through unequal-length halfshafts. The result was nearly as compact as the Mini's configuration, with few of its drawbacks. (The Fiat layout does have its limitations, including poor access for repair and maintenance. Unequal-length halfshafts also tend to exacerbate torque steer, although with well under 100 horsepower, the latter was not a great problem for most small FWD cars.)

The Autobianchi A112, introduced in 1969, applied the technology of the Primula/128 on a smaller scale, becoming the forerunner of the modern "supermini" class. Despite its tiny dimensions, it had an impressive amount of interior room. With its three-door hatchback body, it was versatile, as well. Despite its fairly rudimentary suspension, the A112 was also a nimble little car. A sports car it was not -- the largest standard engine was an OHV four of 903 cc (55 cu. in.) displacement, making 44 horsepower (32 kW) -- but with a curb weight of only 1,500 pounds (685 kg), it had adequate performance, and returned excellent fuel economy.

Just as the Mini's agility had made it a favorite of rally drivers, spawning the Mini Cooper and Mini Cooper S performance derivatives, the A112 soon got its own performance model: the A112 Abarth.

ABARTH

Abarth & C. was an early example of what today we would call a tuner. Its Austrian founder, former motorcycle racer Karl Abarth, fled Austria at the start of World War Two, and subsequently settled in Italy. He eventually became an Italian citizen, changing his first name to Carlo. In 1946, he joined Piero Dusio's new Turin-based race builder/automaker Cisitalia, whose 202 coupe helped make the career of Batista "Pinin" Farina. Three years later, after Dusio sold his interest in Cisitalia to Armando Scagliarini, Abarth became a partner in the firm, which changed its name to Abarth & C. The company's new logo was a distinctive scorpion emblem, derived from Abarth's astrological sign.

Abarth & C.'s primary focus was racing; Scagliarini's son Guido won two national championships in 1949, behind the wheel of the first Abarth cars. Their bread and butter, however, soon became high-performance mufflers and other speed equipment for street cars. By 1962, Abarth was selling more than a quarter million mufflers a year. Along the way, Abarth built relationships with other manufacturers in the Turin area, including Lancia, Fiat, Zagato, Boano, and Pininfarina. Abarth & C. offered highly tuned competition versions of a wide range of cars, from the Simca 1300 to the Porsche 356B. The majority of Abarth's cars were Fiats -- natural enough, given that Fiat was Italy's largest automaker. By 1967, Abarth had offered more than a dozen Fiat-based models.

It should be no surprise, therefore, that Abarth also turned his attention to the A112. His company built their first prototypes of a hopped-up A112 only a few months after the car's launch in 1969, discovering that they could achieve over 100 hp in racing tune.

By 1970, Abarth's reputation was strong -- his team had won over 10,000 races -- but the tuning business was fiercely competitive, and his company was losing money. In 1971, he sold Abarth & C. to Fiat. He remained as CEO for a short time, but he eventually retired to his native Vienna, and died in October 1979. After 1971, Abarth effectively became Fiat's performance division.

THE A112 ABARTH

One of Abarth's first post-buyout models was the A112. Unlike the early racing prototypes, the production A112 Abarth used a 982 cc engine, fitted with twin carburetors, a hotter camshaft, and, of course, an Abarth exhaust system. It was rated at 58 horsepower (43 kW) -- the same as the contemporary Ford Cortina 1300, which weighed around 500 pounds (227 kg) more. 0-60 mph (0-97 kph) took a little under 12 seconds, with a top speed of 94 mph (150 kph). Although not outstanding by today's standards, this was fine performance for a small European car of its era. Competition A112s would be popular rally cars throughout the seventies, even leading to the creation of a one-marque racing series.

In 1975, the Abarth received a bigger, 1,049 cc (64 cu. in.) engine with 70 horsepower (51 kW), as well as a five-speed gearbox. It was renamed Abarth 70, although the Abarth 58 model was still available through 1976. The five-speed Abarth 70 was capable of 0-60mph (0-97 kph) in around 11 seconds, with a top speed of around 100 mph (160 kph).

1972 Autobianchi A112 Abarth front
Ground effects and spoiler border on the ludicrous for a car with a top speed under 100 mph (161 kph), but it helped to distinguish the Abarth from the mundane A112, which was of prime importance to Fiat. Why this car has fog lamps on the rear, but not the front is a more puzzling question, for which we have no answer.

In 1969, Fiat had acquired Lancia, and it eventually consolidated Autobianchi as part of the Lancia organization. By the late seventies, Fiat had dropped the Autobianchi brand in many export markets, badging the A112 as a Lancia instead. Nonetheless, the A112 remained popular, offered in six successive versions through the mid-eighties. In all, more than 1.2 million A112s were sold by the time it went out of production in 1986. The Autobianchi brand survived in Italy and France until 1995, and was finally dropped when the last Autobianchi model, the Fiat Panda-base Y10, was replaced by the Lancia Ypsilon. Fiat eventually sold the rights to the Autobianchi name to Registro Autobianchi, the official Autobianchi club.

Abarth languished after Fiat's withdrawal from racing in the mid-1980s, but in 2007, CEO Sergio Marchionne announced his intention to restore Abarth to its role as Fiat's performance arm, establishing new, dedicated offices in Turin. Its first products were the Grande Punto Abarth and dealer-installed Abarth SS, offering up to 180 hp (132 kW) from Fiat's turbocharged 1.4 L (86 cu. in.) engine. It was joined this past fall by an Abarth version of the new Fiat 500 supermini.

To the best of our knowledge, Autobianchi was never officially imported to the U.S., and the A112 would never have met increasingly stringent federal standards. The owner indicated that it is one of only three of its kind in the States -- a rare and remarkable little car.
# # #

NOTES ON SOURCES

The primary source for the history of Autobianchi and the A112 were their Wikipedia pages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobianchi and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobianchi_A112, accessed 11 October 2008), along with the Sporting Fiats Club's A112 Abarth page (date and author unknown, http://www.sportingfiatsclub.com/models/A112%20Abarth/A112Abarth_000.asp, accessed 30 December 2008). Background on Carlo Abarth came from the Sporting Fiats Club's bio (date and author unknown, http://www.sportingfiatsclub.com/models/124/CarloAbarth.asp, accessed 30 December 2008) and "A Long and Successful History Lies Behind the Revived Abarth Name" (author unknown, 26 February 2007, Italiaspeed.com, http://www.italiaspeed.com/2007/motor_shows/geneva/preview/abarth/history.html, accessed 31 December 2008). Information on the revival of Fiat came in part from Mark Wan, "Grande Punto Abarth" (10 October 2007, AutoZine.org, http://www.autozine.org/html/Fiat/Punto.html, accessed 28 December 2008).

Comments (12)
  • Chris Osterhus

    After finding an old Polistil diecast A112 model some months ago, I was a bit curious about the cars. Wikipedia is well and good, but I think you did it better :)

  • Mad_Science  - It's so little

    Reminds me of a tiny little critter that you'd think was cute until it bit your wagging finger right off.

  • Ed  - A112 Abarth

    Cool article! I guess I have one of the other two in the country! Mine was imported from Netherlands a couple of years ago.

  • AZR  - Rear "fog lamps"

    Are we sure those aren't reverse lights? Possibly added so it could be street legal in the US?

  • Administrator

    No, actually, I'm not, without running into the owner and asking him. That hadn't occurred to me; I assumed the reverse lamps were part of the taillights, but looking more closely at the photo, it doesn't appear so. Hmm...

  • AZR  - Rear "fog lamps"

    I think that the US is pretty much the only country that requires the reversing lights built into the taillight housing, it also appears that they requite two, but this is just from observation. Look at the tail of a European 1st gen. New Mini and you will see a single reversing light (I think in Europe this also lights up red for a rear facing fog/inclement wether light) in the center of the lower bumper. US models have the bumper molded to show where this would go, but have the reversing lights in the taillight housings.

    Now how far back these regs go, I don't know (and didn't try and find out.) If you see the owner of this car again, it would also be interesting to see if he knows whether they are factory or not.

  • Administrator

    The U.S. does not require the reverse lamps to be integral with the taillight housing. Many automakers do that for design convenience, but it's not a regulatory requirement; a lot of cars have them mounted separately. (I don't remember if current law requires two lights; it probably does, but I'm not sure.) They DO have to be white, though. (Some U.S. states restrict the use of fog lamps, particularly rear-facing ones, and most sharply restrict the use of red lights.)

    This car was imported by the owner -- I didn't get a chance to ask for details, but I imagine he was in the military. I don't see any reversing lamps at all, looking at the higher-res photos, so he may have added them to avoid being pulled over. (By 1972, they were required; that was part of the first batch of federal safety rules, which went into effect in January 1968.)

  • AZR

    Informative as always. Clearly I didn't do any research on the taillight laws in the US, but just made an assumption based on never seeing ones in the bumper. And now that I type that out I do believe there are some GM cars, Pontiac Grand Prix? that I recall having them in the bumper.

  • Administrator

    Yeah, a number of U.S. models put them in the bumper; either side of the rear numberplate is also common. Mounting the lights in the bumper is not particularly desirable -- it means they'll break in even a minor parking lot shunt -- but it's legal enough.

  • Francesco

    Wow! An A112 in L.A. it's just too cool! I'm italian, here there's still some of these cute little cars walking down the road, about 10 years ago they were still one of the most common sights on the streets. This was a really smart and succesful car that appealed both to the ladies for its cute and fashionable style as well to young people seeking for some cheap thrills with the Abarth version. Very well written article, keep up the good work (and don't be too mean with '70s personal luxury cars: they were awesome!)!

  • M

    In Europe (and since this car even has the original italian license plate it is originally build according to EU specs) no reverse lights or rear fog lights were required at the time of the A112. I don't know the precise years but in the 80's first reverse lights (at least one, colored white) where required and late in the 80's rear facing foglights (at least one, colored red) where required. There are no requirements for front fog lights in Europe, although in case they are mounted they must be able to operate. Reverse lights have been a populair accessory since the 60's though.

    There where also requirement on the location of the reverse lights and rear fog lights (height, side of the vehicle in case of one) but I don't remember the details. For sure it is not required to be in the light cluster. Most Asian imported vehicles will just get a hole cut in the rearbumper to accomodate a rear fog light to make it a EU vehicle.

    Great site you have here. Keep up the good work.

  • Landmann

    Yes, you're right: these are reverse lights. There were no regulations in Europe in those days (70's) about the strength (lumen) of the lights, the number (you coul have one or two) or the size of the lens. The reverse lights could be put on automatically or manually by a switch mounted on the dash. The only regulation was when to use it.

    Nice site.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Please do not post copyrighted content or images you don't own!

User comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ate Up With Motor, and we accept no responsibility for their content. Publication of a comment does not constitute Ate Up With Motor's endorsement of any opinion, product, or service. Please click here to read our Comment Policy.