Blogads button

blog advertising is good for you
Longlife Button Banner
American Muscle Banner

Editorials and Commentary

Find Us on Facebook

Sponsor icon

Slickcar.com is the auto accessory superstore, offering the latest in car and truck performance parts.

User Login



Auto Parts Nerd

Search Ate Up With Motor

FTC Disclosure Notice


Paid advertising and sponsored links on Ate Up With Motor are identified with the words "Sponsor," "Sponsors," or "Sponsored Links." In the event we receive any other compensation or consideration for any content herein, the nature of that compensation will be disclosed on the final page of the article or content, or otherwise adjacent to it. See the Terms of Use for important additional information regarding Ate Up With Motor's advertising and commercial endorsements.


Designed by
SiteGround web hosting Joomla Templates
Hydra-Matic History: The First Automatic Transmission Print E-mail

Tags: 1940s | 1950s | American cars | Buick | Cadillac | General Motors | Oldsmobile | technology | transmissions

Written by Aaron Severson   
Saturday, 29 May 2010 00:00

The original Hydra-Matic transmission was one of the most important innovations in the history of the automobile. It wasn't the first automatic transmission, but it was the first one that really worked, and its resounding commercial success paved the for every subsequent autoshifter.

This week, we take a look at the origins of the Hydra-Matic, and its originator, Earl Thompson, who also developed the first synchromesh gearbox back in the 1920s.

1942 Oldsmobile B-44 H-M badge

SHIFTING GEARS

Recently, Ferrari raised the hackles of automotive purists with the announcement that it plans to phase out its conventional manual transmissions in favor of F1-style sequential gearboxes. The announcement has given new fuel to an old debate: whether the sliding-gear manual transmission and separate clutch pedal, are fundamentally obsolete.

Outside of a small contingent of enthusiasts and truck drivers, the automotive world has long regarded the manual gearbox as at best a necessary evil. The multi-speed transmission, which dates back to the 1890s evolved to compensate for the limitations of early engines, with their modest power and narrow rev bands. A gear ratio short enough to accelerate a heavy car from rest would have the engine thrashing its guts out above 15 mph (23 km/h) or so, while a ratio optimized for brisk cruising -- say, 40 mph (64 km/h) -- would be sorely tested by steep hills. One of the great attractions of early electric cars, despite their severely limited range, was that they seldom required any gear changes at all, since electric motors produce their maximum torque from 0 rpm. Had early automakers devised a more efficient means of storing electricity, the evolution of passenger-car powertrains might have been very different indeed.

Shifting an early sliding-gear transmission was seldom a pleasant experience. Even upshifts often required careful timing and patience to avoid grinding gears, while downshifts required double clutching and rev matching. Few drivers ever mastered those skills, particularly since tachometers were not common on mundane automobiles. The strategy of many drivers was to shift to high as quickly as possible and then stay there, preferably until coming to a dead stop. There were those who prided themselves on being adept with the gearbox, but they were definitely in the minority.

Automakers were not oblivious to this problem, and quickly began exploring various ways of alleviating it. Henry Ford preferred planetary transmissions -- he did not even learn to use a conventional gearbox until the mid-1920s. The Model T's pedal-operated planetary gearbox avoided clashing gears, although it was scarcely less complicated or labor intensive to use.

Shortly after the Great War, a number of inventors, including Britain's Walter Gordon Wilson and France's Jean Cotal, explored more sophisticated "preselector" planetary transmissions. With a preselector gearbox, you chose the desired ratio with a selector lever and then engaged that gear by pushing the gear selector pedal, which took the place of the traditional clutch. Preselector gearboxes were very convenient when they worked, but they were expensive, heavy, consumed a great deal of power, and were beyond the skill of many mechanics. Cotal and Wilson preselectors were used in a number of British and French cars until the early fifties (and quite a few British buses), but they never quite caught on.

1937 Cord 812 front 3q Stephen Foskett mod
The short-lived, front-wheel-drive Cord 810/812 was one of the few American production cars to use a preselector gearbox, a four-speed Bendix "Electric Hand" transmission. It was adopted because it simplified the linkage between the shifter and the front-mounted gearbox, but it was quite troublesome in service. (Photo © 2006 Stephen Foskett, revised 2010 by the author; used and released under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license)


Even the preselector transmissions were not automatic, although they did make manual shifting relatively painless. There had been experiments with various forms of self-shifting since 1904, although most had limited success. Until the early 1930s, even hydraulic brakes were considered rather advanced, and automatic shifting represented a much greater technological challenge. The sliding-gear transmission, whatever its limitations, was a known quantity.

SILENT SYNCHRO-MESH

Among the many people searching for easier ways to change gears was a hydraulics engineer from Portland, Oregon named Earl A. Thompson. Thompson first started thing simplifying the gear-shifting process while he was in school, although it was another decade before he began to put his ideas into practice. In 1918, he applied for a patent on what he called an "automatic gear-shifting mechanism," using cone-shaped synchronizers to match the speeds of the gears before engaging them. The patent for his invention, issued in 1922, was actually for a preselector transmission, but its most important feature was that it permitted clash-free shifts without double clutching.

Thompson developed a working prototype and installed it in a new Cadillac donated by his younger brother Kirk, a Cadillac dealer in Spokane, Washington. In 1924, Thompson drove the car to Detroit to demonstrate it to automakers. Although most car companies were intensely resistant to outside inventions, Cadillac chief engineer Ernest W. Seaholm and president Lawrence Fisher thought Thompson's invention had promise. Seaholm found Thompson's design crude but intriguing, and referred him to GM's New-Devices Committee. Thompson became so discouraged by the ensuing runaround and general lack of interest that he nearly gave up, but Seaholm finally arranged for Cadillac to take on the development itself, hiring Thompson as a consultant.

Thompson spent the next few years overseeing the development of his synchronizer mechanism, which GM dubbed "Silent Synchro-Mesh." According to Ernest Seaholm, Cadillac built 25 prototypes, which racked up more than 1.5 million miles (2.4 million kilometers) on the GM Proving Grounds before production began in August 1928. It debuted that fall on 1929 Cadillac and LaSalle models.

For cost reasons, the early Synchro-Mesh transmissions were synchronized only in second and third gears -- shifting into first generally required coming to a complete stop. Nevertheless, it was a considerable improvement on earlier 'crashbox' transmissions, and it made driving a great deal easier. Synchro-Mesh quickly spread to other GM divisions, and the design was subsequently licensed by many other automakers. By the mid-thirties, it was standard on most American and many European passenger cars, although it remained rare on trucks and race cars.

Around the time the first Synchro-Mesh cars went on sale, Larry Fisher and Ernest Seaholm promoted Thompson to assistant chief engineer. Thompson had taken much of the teeth gnashing (both literal and figurative) out of shifting. The next step was to make it automatic.

1929 Cadillac 841-B convertible coupe front 3q
Both Cadillac and its cheaper companion make, LaSalle, gained Silent Synchro-Mesh for the 1929 model year. This 1929 Cadillac 841-B is powered by a 341 cu. in. (5.6 L) V8, with about 90 gross horsepower (67 kW); we believe this is a Fisher-bodied convertible coupe. (Photo © 2008 DougW; released for all use by the photographer)


Comments (37)
  • Mike Concordia  - Re: Hydramatic

    I very much enjoyed the first installment of the Hydramatic story. However, I think Henry Ford deserves a little more credit for the basic blue print of a mass produced planetary gearbox. The Model T which debuted in 1908 had the bands, clutch pack and planetary gear sets which are easily recognized in modern automatics.

  • Administrator

    Henry Ford didn't invent the planetary gearset -- epicyclic gear trains were used for a whole variety of industrial purposes in the 19th century -- but he was definitely their most enthusiastic proponent for automotive use (and he also did an enormous amount of work with planetary gears for tractors). I don't know how much of a direct link there were between the Model T and later planetary gearsets (including the various preselectors, most of which were invented in the 1918-1920 period), but certainly any automotive engineer would have been aware of its design.

    Ironically, Ford's own efforts to develop an automatic transmission pretty much came to naught; he was keen to include automatic with his "X car" (which would also have had an X-8 engine), but he couldn't make it work. Ford Motor Company ended up turning to Borg-Warner to develop Ford-O-Matic. Even more ironically, Howard Simpson, who worked very closely with Ford at Fordson (the tractor division) and at Ford on planetary gears, subsequently designed the Simpson gearset used variously by Cruise-O-Matic, TorqueFlite, and Turbo Hydramatic.

  • A Reader  - Rotary vs Radial

    The Continental R-670 is not a rotary (Wankel) engine, but a radial engine.

  • Administrator

    Whoops -- a slip of the keyboard. Thanks!

  • Mark Potluri

    Sorry, I didn't mean to click on the thumbs down icon, happened by accident. Just wanted to clarify.

  • Mark Potluri

    Great article guys!! Keep it coming.

  • Andy  - Hydramatic Fire

    I had vaguely heard of the fire that destroyed the Hydramatic plant in 1953, but this excellent article got me wondering about it. After a bit of searching, I found an interesting photo spread in the November 2, 1953 issue of Life magazine on page 102. It brings home the enormous industrial enterprise and effort that went into the Hydramatic.

    I'm already anticipating next week's installment...

  • Administrator

    The Willow Run plant that GM bought to replace the Livonia factory was truly vast. It was built during the war to build heavy bombers. At its peak in 1944, it was churning out 25 B-24 Liberators -- four-engine heavies much more complicated than any contemporary car -- every day. Kaiser-Frazer leased it after the war, although it had far more capacity than they needed.

  • duke  - Willow Run

    It's still there, and still vast. Note the scale; Willow Run is roughly 4 sq. mi., including runways.

    Willow Run is both a busy freight airport and a GM transmission plant (or was, I'm not sure of Willow Run's role in New G.M.).

    On a semi-related note, Connie Kalitta's successful air freight operation is based at Willow Run. Many will recognize his name from drag racing circles.

    In addition to transmissions, Willow Run was the final assembly point for various GM vehicles. For anyone in the Ypsi area, I highly recommend a visit---the grounds are pretty well wide open, since it's a freight airport. Kind of surreal.

  • res

    I recall from reading an autobiography by W.O. Bentley that he prided himself on his engines having great "flexibility," the ability of the motorcar from a standing stop to start off and accelerate smoothly to top speed in high gear.

    In this series, will you cover the Powerglide as well? My grandparent's '66 Tempest had one of these (along with the OHC 6 you recently covered), and I still remember the disconnected feeling that came with pressing the accelerator and waiting for things to start happening.

  • Administrator

    It's easier to get away without shifting with very large engines -- lots of low-end torque. (Given Bentley's penchant for 4.5-liter fours, he clearly understood that!)

    I'll touch on Powerglide a bit next week. The A-body Tempest did not use Powerglide, though. The Tempest, Special, and F-85/Cutlass used a different two-speed automatic, which Buick called Super Turbine 300. It was developed by the corporate Engineering Staff to replace the different automatics used by the Y-bodies. It worked a lot like Powerglide, but it wasn't the same transmission.

  • trish Marino  - Hrydromatic of Three Rivers,Michigan

    I would like to know the series numbers of the tranmissions that were built at the Hydromatic Plant in Three Rivers, MI. Ther years should be between 1979 to around 1994. This is when General Motors owned it.

  • Administrator

    I'm afraid I don't have that kind of technical information. The best I can suggest is contacting the GM historical archives (http://www.gm.com/corporate/about/heritage/archive/index.jsp) and seeing if they have those records. Sorry!

  • coldwar

    Hello - This morning I found your nice site while attempting to establish the invention and first use of synchonized shift transmissions, thanks for the great read.

    I want to draw your attention to the GM Automatic Safety Transmission for automobiles of 1937-39, which I had understood was the first commercial application of a practical automatic transmission by any maker. This transmission was invented and the prototype(s) made by Oscar Banker in his garage shop in northern Ohio, and subsequently pitched to GM. Although at once interested, by that date GM had invested heavily in H-M development and proceeded to the H-M transmission you outlined (read:'not originated here' syndrome). Banker's transmission was a much simpler design, which was offered essentially unchanged as the AST, and he also originated the safety shift pattern we now know (which H-M never had) and lobbied tirelessly as a ASE member for this shift pattern moving reverse range off the bottom in the name of safety. Banker's transmission design evolved (slightly) in to GM V-Drive used in busses, etc. for decades. His and the transmission's story is in a well written out of print biography of Banker by Robert 'Bob' Hull, and outlines this story in detail with footnotes, including theft of design lawsuits and what followed. I am also a fan of the H-M transmission, but this great story of one inventor getting crushed under (like Ford and Ferguson) rates a mention as his design and use of it passed the test of time - Best & Thanks

  • Administrator

    Hmm. Any sources you can provide on this would be very helpful. Banker's automatic transmission design, on which he applied for a patent in 1936, does have some resemblance to the Automatic Safety Transmission.

    Everything I've seen about the AST suggests that there is a strong relationship between it and Hydra-Matic. There are obvious differences (the arrangement of reverse gear, in particular), but the latter certainly looks like an evolution of the former.

    This bears more investigation, so again, any sources you can provide would be appreciated.

  • Administrator

    Although in any event, calling anything the first is a perilous and ultimately futile endeavor. The Hydra-Matic was the first really successful fully automatic transmission, in that it was produced in number, worked reasonable well, and was commercially successful, but there were many, many earlier attempts, going back to well before World War 1. There are very few automotive inventions that some inventor didn't try long before they found their way into production cars.

  • BuzzDog  - Hydra-Matic Deliveries After the Livonia Fire

    I was surprised to read, "Deliveries to non-GM users didn't resume until later in the 1954 model year," because I've read elsewhere that GM took the noble step of delivering the first Willow Run Hydra-Matics to Hudson, Kaiser and Nash when the first units rolled off the line in October 1953.

    However, I'll also concede that your article cites its sources, which is something that can't be said for the other articles stating that such a gallant gesture was carried out by GM.

  • Administrator

    You're right, I've read that, as well, although it slipped my mind.

    The 1954 part I believe is correct -- although it's important to emphasize that it was the 1954 model year, not the '54 calendar year. By the time the Willow Run plant had been converted, I think all H-M users (GM or not) were at least a few weeks into '54 production. Even if GM sent the first units off the line to its outside customers (which they may well have done, as much for contractual reasons as magnanimity), early '54 models would already have been built with alternative automatics. However, the "to non-GM users" part is possibly inaccurate, or at least misleading, so I've deleted it from the text.

    Thanks!

  • charles l. coker, 1953 pontiac  - your statements about the hydra-matic

    hello, i find some of your statements about the hydra-matic in error. the fluid coupling does not waste fuel or slips alot at low speeds, my own 1953 pontiac chieftain custom catalina would always get 15 to 17 mpg city, and 19 to 20 mpg hwy. the fluid coupling barely slips enough at idle to allow the pontiac straight eight to keep running with a in gear idle speed of 365 rpm's. the hydra-matic's low slippage equal ideal transmission fluid temps that only heavy duty cars like taxi's and police cars needed a fluid cooler installed. as far as handling more than 165 horsepower, you only have to look at what transmission made B&M transmissions famous. the two best automatic transmissions to ever come out of detroit is the the 1955-56 dual-range hydra-matic, and the 1964-67 variable pitch turbo-hydramatic 400. charles l. coker, 1953 pontiac tech advisor, poci.

  • Administrator

    Mr. Coker,

    Thanks for your comment. The remark to which you're referring was a general description of the nature of fluid couplings, not specific to the Hydra-Matic. To function as a clutch, a fluid coupling has to have enough slip to absorb the engine's idle torque, otherwise the engine will stall if the brake is engaged. The amount of slippage at engine idle speed or just off idle is therefore a lot higher than the slippage at cruising speed -- 100% versus less than 5%.

    That said, the Hydra-Matic's fluid coupling had considerably less slip than most, if not all, of its early rivals, and as you note, HM-equipped cars could return quite good fuel economy. Some of that was achieved by using a lower numerical axle ratio than manual-shift cars, but the Hydra-Matic was certainly far more efficient than the early Dynaflow, Powerglide, or Ultramatic. I imagine that if one did a proving grounds comparison between a Hydra-Matic car and a manual-shift car (without overdrive) with the same axle ratios and tire sizes, the manual shift car would probably have a slight edge, but in the real world, it would likely be a wash.

  • Martin T. Meaney

    Sir:
    I am curious as to what oil is used the original Hydra-Matic trans. The military used the Hydra-Matic in the GMC (1950-1955) and used Heavy-duty engine oil as a hydra fluid.
    Can a SAE 10W High-detergent work in this trans?
    Marty Meaney
    Ludlow, VT

  • Administrator

    Marty,

    I'm afraid I'm a historian, not a mechanic, so I'm really not qualified to give technical advice. I'd suggest talking to a shop that overhauls early Hydra-Matics and see what they recommend.

  • Stan Townsend  - Hydra-Matic Transmission Fluid

    Oldsmobile in the early days advised that 10W motor oil could be used in an emergency. I bought a 55 Olds 88 in 1978. It had 46,000 miles on it. The "original" transmission fluid did not have the red dye we associate with ATF or Dexron. I taught for Allison Transmission locally from 1978 to 2003. They reccomend Dexron for all automatics but for "off Highway" use you can use "C" approved fluids which are motor oils that have been approved by Allison

  • Rod  - 1954 chevy 3100 pickup with hydromatic trans

    Can anyone here tell me how many of these 3100 pickups came with the hydromatic? I have the serial# and also the Detroit Transmission Division #off the side of tranny.Please contact me if you can help, and I will give the #s' Thanks, Rod

  • Administrator

    I honestly don't know. The figures GM supplied for Hydra-Matic production unfortunately did not include the truck units, and I have not seen totals elsewhere.

  • Jerry Blastor

    Hi,
    first of all thanks for the nice reading, it's the first time i see this site, i've run into it casually!

    concerning:
    "The best I can suggest is contacting the GM historical archives (http://www.gm.com/corporate/about/heritage/archive/index.jsp) and seeing if they have those records."

    I'm afraid they don't have that information, I already checked.

    Bye,
    Jerry

  • John  - 1937 Olds AST

    Thanks for the great story and information. My late mother, who began driving before WWII, boasted that she never learned to drive a car with a manual transmission. She learned to drive on her mother’s 1937 Oldsmobile with AST, which my grandfather bought from an Oldsmobile rep traveling through the South. My mother later drove the car throughout the WWII years. She said that other than using the clutch pedal to change the gear quadrants, she left it in “High” and that it shifted very much like Hydra-Matic, which she drove for many years afterward. And speaking of Hydra-Matic, I remember as a boy back in the 1950’s, the women in the family talking about the Hydra-Matic “jump”. When starting out, they would always make sure that the gear selector was in the correct quadrant (especially when choosing “Reverse” on the far right side), give it the gas, and then release the parking break. I also remember Hydra-Matic having a rather unique and pleasing sound that is not heard in cars today.

  • Tom Andrews  - HydraMatic fluid coupling slippage

    Two points concerning the fluid coupling in 1940 to 1955 HydraMatic transmissions:
    1. In first gear, the flouid coupling is driven through the front planetary gearset. Thus, the coupling is driven at about 3/4 of engine speed. This reduces "creep" and allows the engine to reach a higher RPM at takeoff.
    2. When the transimssion is in fourth gear, the fluid coupling is effectively locked out and there is no slippage at all. The original HydraMatic was an engineering tour de force, a brilliant design with many patents that frustrated competitors for years.

  • Administrator

    The article mentions (at the top of page 3) that the power flow is through the front planetary and then the impeller, for just that reason. I'm not sure if fourth gear completely eliminated fluid losses from the coupling -- I would have to go back and stare at the shop manual for a while -- but if not, it was close to it. Certainly, Hydra-Matic had far less slippage than any of the early torque converter automatics, although comparing it to Chrysler's Fluid Drive (which had a friction clutch as well as a fluid coupling) would be an interesting exercise. (Before anyone says anything, yes, I'm well aware that Fluid Drive was not a truly automatic transmission!)

  • Administrator

    Okay, I took a look at a Cadillac service manual for the 1941 Hydra-Matic. Power flow in third and fourth gear still goes through the fluid coupling -- it's not locked out completely. However, the front clutch pack has a torque-splitting function in third and fourth; when it's engaged, it simultaneously drives the rear planetary gearset (which is locked together) and the fluid coupling impeller. According to the manual, the rear gearset takes 60% of the input torque, with the other 40% going through the coupling. Since the coupling is taking only 40% of the input torque, its maximum slippage is consequently lower. Not a pure mechanical lockup, but certainly a benefit.

  • Joseph Horne  - Hydramatic Musings

    The first car I ever drove was a 1958 Pontiac with Hydramatic - still, after all these years, the best Automatic ever made. Unlike modern computer controlled automatics, the H-M was analog - shifts were controlled by speed, oil pressure, and many other factors too technical for my level of expertise. In short, they made H_M seem as if it had a personality; indeed, each one I drove (Dual Fluid Couplings from 1956 on)had a distinct feel. Can't prove it, but my feeling is that GM paid more attention to the smoothness of the shifts the more expensive the model. My friend's parent's '59 Olds 98 Convertible had a 2d to 3d shift that you couldn't feel, only hear the revs drop. My Pontiac, on the other hand, had a very pronounced 2 to 3 shift. And yes, echoing an earlier comment, they had a distinctive sound.

  • Administrator

    I'm not sure exactly how much difference there was in the dual-coupling Hydra-Matic across divisions. With some of the other transmissions, there was a lot; Turboglide and Flight Pitch Dynaflow, for example, were different transmissions, even though they were each based on the same Engineering Staff concept. On the other hand, those transmissions were manufactured by the divisions themselves, whereas the Hydra-Matic came from Hydra-Matic Division. I would assume that there were at least minor adjustments to tune the transmission for each division's engines -- the Oldsmobile, Pontiac, and Cadillac V8s in those days were quite different, and didn't have the same torque curves -- but I don't know how extensive those changes may have been, or if there were also significant variations in internal materials, transmission mount design, etc.

    Complicating that question is the fact that there were a lot of minor revisions to the dual-coupling Hydra-Matic during its first few years, to improve reliability, deal with teething problems, and so forth. Furthermore, the dual-coupling transmission was a very, very complex bit of business (part of the reason GM eventually phased it out). Minor production variations between individual transmissions might also make for small but perceptible differences in feel.

    Of course, it's not improbable that someone at Pontiac told Hydra-Matic Division, "Hey, we'd like a little firmer shift quality, for a sportier feel." On the other hand, it's also possible that the transmission in a '59 Pontiac might feel a little different than one in a '58, especially if they were at opposite ends of the allowable production tolerances. Hard to say.

  • Gabriel  - Hydra-Matic in Brazil

    Hello!
    In first place i´d like to congratulate your work here. Fantastic! Very informative and entertaining. Now about the topic, and just to measure the historical importance of the first Hydra-Matic, here in Brazil people often call any kind of automatic transmission "hidramático" (it´s how they called them in the late '40s, early '50s, and the name is still in use!). But the "hidramáticos" still are kind of rare in our country, people prefer to change the gears by themselves. Only in the 2000s automatic transmissions started to take off in sales, and in 2010 they represented 16% of total sales (compared to just 5.5% in 2005).
    Now a little off topic: You mentioned the Willow Run Manufacturing Plant, was that plant constructed by Ford Motor Company for the construction of aircrafts?
    Thank you for your articles and information!
    Best regards
    Gabriel

  • Administrator

    Gabriel,

    Yes, the Willow Run plant was originally constructed by Ford, building Consolidated B-24 Liberator heavy bombers under license. At the end of the war, it was leased by the new Kaiser-Frazer company, which later bought the plant outright. Kaiser sold Willow Run to GM in 1953.

  • marlin boeshore  - hydra-matic

    i have a hdra-matic that has the b&m automotive chevy bolt pattern bellhousing on it that is a very interresting transmission love to hear about the history on that transmission it is hard to get information on old transmission

  • Art Baethke

    Hi, I was tring to find some information, on the 1938 Oldsmobile AST transmission. I cannot understand why the information is so hard to find? I owned a 1938 Olds with the AST and a 6 cylinder engine. I did not like it and let my brother use it. He complained that, it cost more to put oil in the transmission, than it did gas. They used motor oil in the trany. So I sold it.
    My first boss had a 1937 Hudson, with there Electric vacumm shift transmission, which I drove, at times. Both of these early tranys are hard to find info on.
    Art Baethke

  • Administrator

    Art,

    The AST was short-lived, and really quite rare. As best I can figure, production was no more than about 25,000 units, and as you saw, customer reaction to it was not great. I suspect that there weren't too many AST-equipped left on the road by the end of the war. Also, I don't think Oldsmobile encouraged dealers to take them apart; there was a program that let people trade a defective unit for a replacement for about $75. So, I'm not sure if there was even a dealer repair manual for it.

    The Hudson system is a little better documented. (It was made by Bendix, known as the "Electric Hand.") It was sort of an add-on vacuum/electric preselector system -- it added a vacuum cylinder to the gearbox that would execute the actual shifts. There was a selector switch on the steering column that you would use to choose what gear you wanted, and another (usually attached to the clutch pedal) that would trigger the actual shift via solenoid. You could also order Electric Hand with a vacuum-operated clutch that would disengage automatically if you lifted your foot completely off the throttle and then reengage when you pressed the accelerator. (Hudson promoted the combination as Selective Automatic Shift, but it wasn't exactly automatic, and as far as I know, the preselector and the vacuum clutch were technically separate options.) Hudson-Terraplane clubs would probably know where you could find service manuals or other technical info, if you wanted a more detailed explanation. Likewise, Cord collectors are familiar with it, as the Electric Hand was used on the 810 and 812.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Please note that user comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ate Up With Motor, and we accept no responsibility for their content. Publication of a comment does not constitute Ate Up With Motor's endorsement of any opinion, product, or service. Please click here to read our Comment Policy.
Last Updated on Thursday, 29 December 2011 16:34