Model Histories
Terms and Technology
Editorials and Commentary
User Login
Support Ate Up With Motor
Search Ate Up With Motor
| Out in Front: The Front-Wheel-Drive Oldsmobile Toronado |
|
|
|
| Written by Aaron Severson |
| Monday, 16 June 2008 13:53 |
|
Despite the geriatric image it acquired in its declining years, GM's Oldsmobile division once had a reputation for engineering innovation. It was Oldsmobile that introduced the world's first fully automatic transmission, the first high-compression OHV V8 engine, the first turbocharged production car, and, of course, the first front-wheel-drive car built in America since 1937: the Toronado. FORWARD THINKINGUntil the 1970s, the large majority of production cars around the world adhered to what is sometimes called "Le Systeme Panhard": a front-mounted engine driving the rear wheels, usually via a long propeller shaft that connects the transmission to a differential between the drive wheels. This layout has its drawbacks, but it is simple, durable, and, most critically, cheap.
Although it did not become commonplace until the late sixties, the idea of a front-mounted engine driving the front wheels -- front-wheel drive -- goes back decades. It was essayed on a small scale before World War One, and in the 1920s, Harry Miller even ran front-drive race cars at the Indianapolis 500. Although some European manufacturers, notably Citroën, used front-wheel drive with some success starting in the 1930s, it remained quite rare even in Europe until well after the war. In America, the only serious efforts at production FWD cars were the Cord L-29, the Ruxton, and the Cord 810/812. None was commercially successful, and all perished before America's entrance into World War Two. Front-engine/front-wheel-drive (FF) layouts offer several advantages:
THE UPP CONCEPTDespite its advantages, American automakers were very slow to adopt front-wheel drive, primarily because of the cost. All else being equal, front-wheel drive is not necessarily any more expensive than rear-wheel drive, and in some cases, may even be cheaper. However, the American industry had invested heavily in rear-drive hardware, and designing and building FWD cars represented a hefty investment. Several automakers, including Kaiser, had flirted with the idea, but inevitably, the accountants ruled against it.
Both Ford and GM experimented with front-wheel drive in the fifties, although with no immediate intention of offering it in production cars. Nevertheless, some engineers, like Ford's Fred Hooven, strongly advocated front-wheel drive for its greater packaging and weight efficiency. Hooven called rear-wheel drive "antiquated," and contended that if Ford's cars were already front-wheel drive and someone proposed switching them to rear drive, the drawbacks of the idea would render it laughable. Despite his impolitic candor, Hooven understood the development cost issues, so he devised a unique "power pack" concept, combining engine, transmission, and differential into a single, compact package, using many preexisting components. Hooven proposed this system for the 1961 Ford Thunderbird, but the inherent conservatism of Ford management -- and perhaps their disdain for the colorfully eccentric Hooven himself -- doomed the idea early on. Although Ford adopted front-wheel drive for the German Ford Taunus 12M in 1962, a planned FWD version for North America, code-named Cardinal, died stillborn. At GM, the corporate Power Development and Transmission Development teams devised a very similar concept in 1955, which the engineers dubbed the Unitized Power Package, or UPP. Like many GM corporate engineering efforts, this was not intended for production, and development delays meant that GM didn't even use it for its original intended purpose, the LaSalle II show car. The UPP concept ended up on the shelf. BELTZ AND BRACESIn early 1958, a bright young engineer named John Beltz, then Oldsmobile's assistant chief engineer, became very enthusiastic about the possibility of using front-wheel drive for a compact family car. At that time, Oldsmobile was already working on a compact sedan that eventually emerged in 1961 as the Olds F-85/Cutlass, but the F-85 was a FR car, with a small V8 engine and a live rear axle. Beltz convinced Oldsmobile advanced engineering chief Andy Watt to let him build an experiment front-drive F-85, using the Unitized Power Package concept. Watt called the results "highly encouraging," but Oldsmobile's conservative general manager, Jack Wolfram, thought a FWD F-85 would have to be far too expensive to be viable in the compact car market.
Beltz nevertheless managed to convince his boss, Oldsmobile chief engineer Harold Metzel, that front-wheel drive was worth pursuing. Metzel eventually convinced Wolfram, and the two of them asked the corporation for approval to build a full-size FWD car. GM chairman Frederic Donner was skeptical, and responded that he could not approve such a concept until Oldsmobile demonstrated a fully developed car to the executive committee. THE FLAME RED CARAround the same time, Oldsmobile was also lobbying for its own personal-luxury car to compete with the popular Ford Thunderbird. Oldsmobile already had one erstwhile Thunderbird rival, the Starfire, but it was really just a fancier version of the regular Super Eighty-Eight. It was far less distinctive than the Thunderbird, and its sales had been disappointing.
In 1962, chief Oldsmobile stylist Stan Wilen gave his designers a chance to blow off steam by creating dream cars that they themselves might like to own. The unanimous favorite of these designs was a rendering by Dave North, known as the "Flame Red Car." North's creation also got an enthusiastic response from Wilen's boss, GM styling VP Bill Mitchell. North had not conceived the Flame Red Car with production in mind, but Bill Mitchell thought it would make a fine personal car. As with the earlier Buick Riviera, Mitchell began lobbying for the corporation to build it. If Mitchell had had his way, the Flame Red Car would have been built on the new A-body intermediate platform, which debuted in 1964 to replace the previous Y-body Oldsmobile F-85, Buick Special, and Pontiac Tempest. Using the A-body would have made the car relatively compact and sporty, with modest weight and good performance. A few weeks after North's design was finished, however, Ed Cole, then the head of the car and truck group to whom the division managers reported, ordered Oldsmobile to develop a personal-luxury coupe to share the bigger E-body shell of the Buick Riviera. Mitchell and Wilen showed North's design to Cole and Jack Wolfram. Cole and Wolfram both liked the design, but Cole was adamant that the car had to use the bigger E-body. Mitchell was not pleased, but, given the choice between enlarging the design and not building it at all, he grudgingly acquiesced. Stan Wilen ordered his studio to scale up Dave North's design for the bigger platform. As frustrating as the decision to adopt the bigger E-body was for Mitchell and Wilen, it ended up dovetailing with Oldsmobile's plans for front-wheel drive. The Olds E-car would be a more expensive, smaller-volume car, aimed at buyers who were more willing to pay a premium for stylistic or technical novelty. A front-drive personal-luxury car was a much easier sell to corporate management than a FWD family car. ![]() This is a '66 Toronado, showing the original front-end styling, which was quite close to Dave North's original "Flame Red Car." The forward-canted fenders, pop-up headlamps, and minimalist grille were intended to evoke the "coffin-nose" Cord 810 and 812 of the late 1930s. The Toronado had Oldsmobile's biggest and most powerful engine, the 385-hp 425 (7.0L) V8. It was largely identical to the engine in other big Oldsmobiles, except for the oil pan and the intake manifold, which was a new low-rise design to clear the Toronado's low hood. The latter contributed to a number of engine fires -- the carburetor's fuel lines were very close to the manifold, which tended to get dangerously hot. (Photo © 2007 Karrmann; used under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license) Ed Cole was amenable to that idea, and in the spring of 1964, the executive committee approved front-wheel drive for the Oldsmobile E-body. Originally, senior management wanted the Buick and Cadillac E-bodies to be FWD, as well, sharing the costs between all three divisions. Cadillac cautiously agreed, although their own front-drive E-body, the Eldorado, would be delayed until 1967. Buick balked at the FWD proposal, and eventually won approval to retain its own front-engine, rear-drive platform. Thus, when the new Oldsmobile bowed for the 1966 model year, it would stand alone -- the only front-wheel-drive car in America, and the first in nearly 30 years. Olds considered various names for the new car. Early reports suggested the name "Holiday," which Oldsmobile had used for its pillarless hardtops since 1949. (Buick had used the Riviera name in much the same way.) Other possibilities included Cirrus (later a Chrysler sedan) and Sirocco (later a Volkswagen). Finally, Semon "Bunkie" Knudsen, then general manager of Chevrolet, offered a name Chevy had registered for a 1963 show car, for which the division had no further plans. Thus, the Olds front-drive E-car became the Oldsmobile Toronado. UNDER THE SKINUnlike the new breed of transverse-engine, front-wheel-drive subcompacts that were beginning to appear in Europe at that time, the Toronado's engine was mounted longitudinally, although it was offset a few inches to the right, compared to other Oldsmobiles. This engine, a mostly standard Olds 425 (7.0 L) V8, was linked to a modified Turbo Hydramatic transmission. The Turbo Hydramatic's torque converter was mounted on the back of the engine, as usual, but the transmission itself was turned 180 degrees and mounted below and to the left of the engine. The torque converter turbine drove the transmission input shaft by means of a short metal chain, developed in partnership between GM's Hydra-Matic division and Borg-Warner's Morse Chain Division. The differential, meanwhile, was a very slim planetary unit, which was mounted in front of the transmission, driving the front wheels via short half-shafts with Rzeppa-type constant-velocity (CV) joints at each end. Except for the differential, CV joints, and the chain drive itself, most of the package used off-the-shelf hardware, even the transmission. Although the transmission's gears and clutch packs had to be modified to operate backward, most of its major components were shared with the standard, rear-drive TH400.
The Toronado's Unitized Power Package was compact, clever, and cost-effective, but it was also similar enough to Fred Hooven's design at Ford to constitute patent infringement, although the similarity appears to have been coincidental. Although GM executives were extremely cagey about the subject for many years, GM apparently had to pay royalties to Ford for using the UPP. Ironically, Ford itself never used the design, and well into the 1970s, Ford chairman Henry Ford II was openly dismissive of front-wheel drive. ![]() The original Toronado had slotted wheels, a touch borrowed from the 1930s Cord 810/812, and finned drum brakes, both intended to provide better brake cooling. Despite these efforts, the Toro's total effective brake area was hopelessly inadequate for its weight, resulting in long stopping distances and serious brake fade, hard to excuse in a car capable of more than 130 mph (210 kph). CAR OF THE YEARWith a base price of $4,617, the Toronado was by far the most expensive Oldsmobile model, and that price tag did not include amenities like power windows, air conditioning, or a radio. A fully equipped Toronado approached $6,000, which was verging on Cadillac territory in those days. It was a bold move for Oldsmobile.
The contemporary press, weary of the mechanical sameness of most Detroit offerings, showered the Toronado with hosannas. Motor Trend inevitably named it Car of the Year, and other magazines were similarly smitten. They cast a jaundiced eye on its girth, and some harsh words were reserved for its pathetic brakes, but its sheer innovation won over most critics. ![]() The Toronado's broadly flared fenders contrive to make its bulk look aggressive, rather than merely big. This car has the original slotted steel wheels, with front disc brakes. The discs were a great improvement over the standard drums, which did not so much stop the car as gently suggest it consider slowing down. Even with discs, though, the brakes faded dramatically in repeated stops. The Toronado was not an overwhelmingly fast car. Despite its claimed 385 horsepower (287 kW), and the ease with which it could send its front tires up in smoke, its weight and relatively tall gearing kept acceleration in the "moderately brisk" category. 0-60 mph (0-97 kph) took a little under 9 seconds. With a longer run, it was capable of nearly 135 mph (217 kph). It was not as quick as a Buick Riviera Gran Sport, but it was notably faster than a contemporary Thunderbird. Oldsmobile sold 40,963 Toronados in 1966, not bad for an entirely new and rather expensive car,but 1967 sales dipped depressingly to 21,790. Stylistically, the '67s weren't significantly different from the '66s, except for a restyled grille, but radial tires and front disc brakes became available, which was a helpful improvement in stopping power. The 1968s, like our photo car, got a new front clip with the gaping grille openings Stan Wilen had previously talked John Beltz out of demanding. The 425 was replaced by a redesigned 455 (7.5L) engine, with better mid-range torque. A GT model was added, claiming an even 400 gross horsepower (298 kW). Total sales rose to 26,454. ![]() The '68 Toronado got a new front clip with far more chrome than the original, but it retained concealed headlamps. Unlike the original's pop-up lights, the '68 actually had two sets of grilles -- the fronts rotated up into the nose to expose the second, on which the headlamps were mounted. For all the over-engineering, the motor often failed, and many owners leave them permanently in the open position. The '68 Toronado had a new 455 cu. in. (7.5L) engine, down from 385 to 375 gross horsepower (287 to 279 kW), but with a mammoth 510 lb-ft (691 N-m) of torque. A Force-Air version was optional, with 400 hp (298 kW) and 500 lb-ft (672 N-m) of torque. Car and Driver's reviewers wondered why Oldsmobile hadn't done more to promote the car's front-wheel drive, noting that it wasn't even mentioned in the owner's manual. It was a paradox -- in most respects, the Toronado's FWD was a gimmick, providing no real advantage in performance or packaging, but it was a gimmick that Oldsmobile didn't really promote. John Beltz, who became general manager of Oldsmobile in 1969, said in a December 1970 interview with Motor Trend, "[W]e are selling Toronados; we're not selling front-wheel-drive." We wonder if Oldsmobile's reticence had something to do with to the Ford patent. Oldsmobile may originally have intended to promote front-wheel drive more heavily, but changed its plans late in the game, reluctant to brag too loudly about an innovation on which it was paying royalties to a rival. Whatever the reason, Oldsmobile's ambivalence deprived the Toronado of a coherent identity. Unlike the Eldorado, which was unmistakeably a Cadillac, the Toronado bore little resemblance to other Olds models. It was not so much a flagship for the brand as it was an interesting anomaly, and its modest sales reflected that marginal status. So, why did they bother? The answer may lie in a conversation between stylist Stan Wilen and GM chairman Fred Donner, not long after the Toronado's release. In a 1976 interview with Michael Lamm of Special Interest Autos, Wilen recalled that Donner came into the Olds studio one day and remarked that cars like the Toronado were good for the company, even if they weren't extraordinary sales successes. They demonstrated to customers that GM was not staid or complacent, Donner said, "that we're constantly striving to do something better." As good as that sounds, it also reveals GM's profound disinterest in real innovation. In the corporation's view, the FWD Toronado was not a testbed for new ideas, it was a promotion, like the Motorama show cars of a decade earlier. It was a way for GM to show off its engineering might on neat concepts that they had no intention of applying to their bread-and-butter products. THE PATRON SAINT OF LOST CAUSESJohn Beltz may have hoped the Toronado would be a proof-of-concept for the front-wheel-drive family car he originally conceived. If the division had continued to develop the FWD V6 sedan he and Watt had built in 1960, Olds might have had a sophisticated and viable compact sedan by the early seventies, a credible rival for European and Japanese competitors. By the time the Toronado appeared, however, it was obvious that GM management wasn't interested in any such thing. # # # NOTES ON SOURCESOur sources for this article included Michael Lamm, "Toro & Cord: So different and yet so much alike!" Special Interest Autos #35, July-August 1976, reprinted in Terry Ehrich, ed., The Hemmings Book of Oldsmobiles (Bennington, VT: Hemmings Motor News, 2001); John Katz, "1966 Oldsmobile Toronado vs. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado: The Front Line of Front-Wheel Drive," Special Interest Autos #168, November-December 1998, reprinted in Terry Ehrich, ed., The Hemmings Motor News Book of Cadillacs (Hemmings Motor News Collector-Car Books)
Driving impressions and performance figures came from the road tests "Oldsmobile Toronado" (Car Life, February 1966) and "Oldsmobile Toronado" (Car and Driver, April 1968), both of which are reprinted in R.M. Clarke, ed., Oldsmobile Muscle Portfolio 1964-1971 (Muscle Portfolios)
Comments (2)
Joomla components by Compojoom
|















The comparison of the Toronado to the Riviera is slightly askew from the more directly similar Cadillac Eldorado, which used the same GM front wheel drive system, whereas Riviera comparison leads to Thunderbird, Lincoln Continental Mark cars, and then in '67, even the larger intermediate AMC Marlin.