As enjoyable as convertibles can be on beautiful, sunny summer days, they can be a terrible burden any other time -- drafty, noisy, and vulnerable. We suspect that anyone who's ever owned one has at least occasionally wished they could magically transform it into a regular coupe on days when the sun is too hot or the wind too cold. Fifty years ago, the Ford Motor Company offered a car that could do exactly that, creating a piece of mechanical showmanship that has only recently been surpassed: the Skyliner retractable hardtop.
THE CLASS OF '57
'57 Fords are all but forgotten these days, so it may surprise you to learn that in their day, they actually outsold that perennial icon, the '57 Chevy. In fact, the 1957 Ford was the best-selling car in the world. Ford sales that year totaled 1,655,069, beating second-place Chevrolet by about 170,000 units and Plymouth by more than two to one.
It was a hard-won victory for Ford, which had struggled since the late 1930s to regain its traditional lead in the American low-price market. Before the mid-thirties, Fords routinely outsold Chevys, but by 1939, their positions had been reversed, and remained that way, with few exceptions, well into the 1950s.
The '57 Ford hood medallion incorporates a tiny family crest and the letters "F O R D."
It was not for lack of trying on Ford's part. The mid-fifties had seen a brutal game of one-upmanship between the two rivals, including a vicious price war that did considerable damage to their smaller competitors. Ford and Chevrolet could afford to cut prices to the bone in hopes of becoming number one, but companies like Studebaker and Hudson could not, bringing those independent automakers that much closer to extinction. Another front in that war was the field of halo cars and headline-grabbing novelties, like the Corvette, or fuel injection. Many of these sold in limited numbers, and how much they were actually worth in publicity value is debatable, but they were a matter of considerable corporate pride.
Ford had stolen a match on Chevrolet in 1954, but Chevy moved ahead again in 1955 and 1956, despite the allure of Ford's glamorous two-seat Thunderbird. It was not until 1957 that Ford again claimed the number-one slot.
Ford's success that year had much to do with styling. Beloved as it is today, the '57 Chevy was not well regarded in its time. A facelift of a two-year-old body, it was unfashionable tall and stocky by the standards of the day. The '57 Plymouths, meanwhile, low slung and high finned, were racy, but perhaps a little too racy for some customers, even before Chrysler's problems with build quality and rust began to alienate buyers. In the best Goldilocks tradition, Ford found the comfortable middle ground. It was noticeably lower and sleeker than the Chevy, but not as low as the Plymouth; it was modern, but not radical. It was also larger than either of its rivals, which American buyers of the time still saw as a sign of value.
All Fords except the Skyliner came standard with a 223 cu. in. (3.7 L) six; the Skyliner's base engine was the 272 cu. in. (4.5 L) "Y-block" V8, introduced in 1954. The most powerful regular engine option was a 312 cu. in. (5.1 L) version of the same engine, with 245 hp (183 kW), but a few were special ordered with the rare "F-code" supercharged version of the 312, with a claimed 300 hp (224 kW). Most of the F-code engines went into lighter Customlines or Thunderbirds, but six supercharged Skyliners are known to survive.
Beyond all that, however, Ford also offered the most show-stopping novelty item of all: the Skyliner -- as Ford advertising breathlessly put it, "the world's only Hide-A-Way hardtop."
WHAT'S IN A NAME
Technically speaking, the Skyliner was not a separate model -- it was part of the top-of-the-line Fairlane 500 trim series, and thus properly known as Fairlane 500 Skyliner. (If you look closely at our photo subject, you'll see the Fairlane 500 badges on its rear fenders.)
If you're only familiar with the stodgy, midsize Ford Fairlanes of the 1960s, the appearance of the Fairlane name may be a little confusing. From 1955 to 1961, the Fairlane was a model series of Ford's full-size line, comparable to the Chevy Bel Air. The name was an evocative one for Ford; "Fair Lane" was the 1,300-acre (5.3 km²) Dearborn estate of the company's late founder.
Confusingly, from 1954 to 1956, the Skyliner name had been applied to a completely different concept, a hardtop coupe with a transparent roof panel. Originally introduced in the 1954 Crestline series, the Skyliner's Plexiglas "bubble top" was suggested by either stylist Gordon Buehrig or Ford interior design chief Dave Ash, possibly inspired by the "Vista-Dome" observation cars that had become popular on passenger trains a few years earlier. Unlike the modern glass moonroof, which it superficially resembled, the bubble top was a fixed section of 0.25-in (6 mm) thick, green-tinted Plexiglas. Also used in the contemporary Mercury Sun Valley, the Skyliner roof was a unique conversation piece, but it allowed fearsome solar heat gain, even with the nylon headliner closed. It sold relatively well at first, but once buyers found how miserable it could make hot summer days, interest tapered off quickly.
Undaunted, Ford offered the transparent roof again in 1955 and 1956, this time as an option on the Fairlane Crown Victoria, whose wrap-over bright metal roof trim provided a convenient boundary for the Plexiglas panel. The Fairlane Crown Victoria Skyliner cost about $70 more than a standard Crown Victoria, which probably contributed to its poor sales: only 2,602 went out the door in two model years.
After results like that, it wouldn't have been a surprise if Ford had axed the name entirely, but someone must have thought it had a nice ring to it, because in 1957, it was applied to the new -- and entirely unrelated -- retractable hardtop.
RETRAC
Even in 1957, the idea of a convertible with a retractable metal roof was hardly a new one. Despite its wind-in-the-hair romantic image, the true open car offered more hassles than pleasure: poor weather protection, excessive noise, and vulnerability to theft and vandalism. Fabric tops, even with proper roll-up side windows, were a half measure -- easily operated, adequately padded, properly sealing soft tops were not really commonplace until the 1980s. As early as the 1910s, some buyers opted for a bolt-on "California top" for the winter months, the ancestor of the accessory hardtops offered on some later convertibles. This addressed most of the problems, but it was hardly convenient, since the top could only be removed with a wrench, and had to be stored separately. The obvious solution was a hardtop that could be stored in the car itself, and raised and lowered at will.
One of the first efforts at such a top -- barring shade-tree improvisations lost to history -- was created in 1922 by a Salt Lake City, Utah inventor named Ben Ellerbeck, who developed a "shiftable top" for the Hudson Super Six. Little apparently came of Ellerbeck's design. About a decade later, the French designer Georges Paulin, a part-time stylist for coachbuilder Marcel Pourtout, developed and patented a retractable roof mechanism that Pourtout subsequently licensed to Peugeot. Its first production application was the 1935 Peugeot 402BL Éclipse Décapotable, offered in limited numbers through 1940. (Click here for photos of the 402BL.) In 1940, stylists Alex Tremulis and Ralph Roberts at Briggs Body Works developed a similar electrical hideaway roof for the Chrysler Thunderbolt show car, a handful of which were sold to the public. (Click here for pictures.)
In the early 1950s, Ford stylist Gilbert Spear developed a model of a new type of retractable hardtop. Spear's work eventually came to the attention of William Clay Ford, younger brother of company president Henry Ford II and the head of Ford's Special Projects Division. At the time, Bill Ford was planning the car that became the Continental Mark II. He was inspired by Spear's design, which he thought would add distinction to the new Continental. In early 1953, Ford assigned a team of Special Projects engineers, led by Ben Smith, to transform Spear's concept into a production-ready design.
Some of Ben Smith's team suggested splitting the roof in half (which is frequently done with modern 'retracs,' some of which even split it into three sections), but Smith opted instead for the short "flipper" section, which tucks neatly under the rest of the roof in the stowed position. The Skyliner's rear seat had to be relocated for clearance, but it lost little, if any leg or shoulder room, thanks to clever packaging.
One of the biggest challenges of the 'retrac' project was the size of the roof. Both the Éclipse and Thunderbolt designs had used tiny, three-window canopies, which could more easily be stowed under the rear deck. While the Continental would have a relatively short greenhouse, it was a genuine four-seater, so its roof would be significantly larger than either the Peugeot or the Chrysler. This posed stowage problems, particularly with the Continental's short rear deck. Smith's solution was to hinge the forward section of the roof, allowing it to fold separately, thus reducing the stowed volume of the top.
Smith's finished design was a thing of beauty, but it was enormously complex, using seven separate electric motors to raise the decklid and package shelf; unlock, unfold, and raise the two-section "flipper" roof; and lock the roof to the headliner. It was fully automated, requiring only about 40 seconds to open or close. Perhaps Smith's most significant achievement was ensuring that the top mechanism was neatly counterbalanced; relatively little force was needed to move each component, allowing the motors to be lightly stressed. (The production Skyliner actually included a hand crank, allowing the top to be opened or closed if one of the motors failed.)
Given its complexity, the development was very quick, and a working prototype -- based on a 1952 Lincoln Capri hardtop -- was ready by the fall of 1953. By early 1954, Smith's team was readying the mechanism for the Continental.
The Skyliner is about 211 inches (5,359 mm) long, roughly three inches (76 mm) longer than other Fairlane 500s, on the same 118-inch (2,997-mm) wheelbase. The side-spear trim, shared with the rest of the line, was inspired by the 1954 Mystère show car. Ford later reused the rear-hinged decklid concept, and its operating mechanisms, for the 1961-1966 Ford Thunderbird and Lincoln Continental convertibles.
THE CONTINENTAL THAT WASN'T
By then, Henry Ford II was losing enthusiasm for the retractable hardtop, and for the Continental program in general. Bill Ford's cost-no-object engineering approach was proving to be very expensive, and some senior Ford executives doubted that it would ever make any money. Even without the 'retrac,' the Continental's retail price was already approaching $10,000 -- nearly $80,000 in modern dollars, and a towering sum for an American car of this era. Bill Ford insisted that buyers would happily pay a $2,500 premium for the prestige of the retractable hardtop, but his older brother was skeptical. (Henry's skepticism was well founded; despite the Mark II's high price, Ford lost money on each one it sold.) The Mark II would go forward only as a fixed hardtop coupe.
Nevertheless, Ford was reluctant to write off the $2.2 million that Special Projects had spent developing the retractable roof mechanism. In November 1954, Ben Smith and his group were ordered to adapt the "retrac" for the 1957 Ford line.
The '57 Ford had not been designed with the retractable roof in mind, and adapting it was a challenge, requiring many unique components. Bill Boyer's styling team had to stretch the tail of the standard Fairlane convertible about 3 inches (76 mm) and raise the rear deck to allow enough room for the stowed top. The fuel tank had to be relocated behind the rear seat, while the spare tire went under the trunk floor, where the fuel tank had been. Depressions also had to be hammered into the top of each rear wheel well to allow clearance for the top mechanism; they looked alarmingly like dents, although they were both deliberate and necessary.
Round tail lamps and modest fins echo the contemporary two-seat Thunderbird, which was wholly intentional. Note the way the rear deck bulges relative to the fins; the beltline height of the deck was raised to allow more room for the stowed top, which makes the Skyliner look a little bulbous from the rear.
THE SHOWSTOPPER
The Skyliner bowed in December 1956, more than a month after the rest of the Ford line. Its body may have looked a little ungainly, but the operation of the top was dazzling. Shortly after it debuted, Ford arranged a guest appearance on the popular I Love Lucy program to demonstrate its operation.
Dim lights
Embed Embed this video on your site Impressive, the Skyliner was; cheap, it certainly was not. With a starting price of $2,942, it was fully 20% more expensive than a Fairlane 500 hardtop, and that price did not include automatic transmission, power steering, or a radio. With a full load of options, it would run close to $3,500, which was in the same realm as a Thunderbird.
The complex top mechanism also incurred a substantial weight penalty. The Skyliner weighed 380 pounds (176 kg) more than a normal Sunliner convertible -- well over 4,000 pounds (1,820 kg) fully equipped. With so much weight, even the largest available engines had their work cut out for them. Although we found no period road tests of the Skyliner itself, Motor Trend's '57 Fairlane 500 sedan with the optional 245-horsepower (183 kW) 312 cu. in. (5.1 L) engine and Fordomatic required 11.1 seconds to reach 60 mph (97 kph). A similarly equipped Skyliner, weighing 530 lb (240 kg) more, would be decidedly slower -- even more so with the standard 212-hp (158 kW) 292 cu. in. (4.8 L) engine. The extra weight also served to make the big Ford's handling and braking even more ponderous than usual.
This bin (whose colorfully decorated cover is not standard) was the only safe place to stow luggage in the trunk. Although there appears to be a lot of empty space beneath the vast rear deck, anything other than small oddments was in danger of being crushed (or jamming) the lever arms of the top mechanism. Ford offered a set of fitted luggage to fit this bin, but the Skyliner was not a car for long trips.
Despite the modest performance, the Skyliner was more practical than the Thunderbird, and it outshone even the T-Bird in its ability to awe passerby. Sales of the two cars for 1957 were actually very similar: 20,766 Skyliners, 21,380 Thunderbirds, the latter's sales were inflated by an unusually long model year. The Skyliner accounted for less than 2% of total Ford sales in 1957, but it undoubtedly brought many curious buyers to showrooms, just for a chance to see it in operation.
SOPHOMORE SLUMP
It seems to be a perverse natural law that the most elaborate and extravagant products appear just as the economy turns sour. The "Eisenhower recession" began shortly before the 1958 Fords went on sale, taking a serious bite out of mid-price car sales. A hike in the Skyliner's base price, to $3,163, did not help; Skyliner sales fell by 30% in 1958, to 14,713.
1958 proved to be a bad year for Ford in general. Buyers were not enamored of the 1958 facelift, which added trendy quad headlamps. Ford's total volume plummeted by more than 40% from its 1957 height, despite the introduction of the popular new four-seat Thunderbird.
As the top of the standard Ford line, the Skyliner had an appropriately plush level of trim, including a well-padded headliner and a dome light. With the top up, there was little obvious sign that you were riding in a convertible, other than the top control, which was on the dash to the left of the steering column.
That might well have been the end of the line for the 'retrac,' which was expensive to produce, as well as to buy, but the Skyliner found an unexpected supporter in Ford Division general manager Robert McNamara. Ordinarily, McNamara had little patience for high-priced, low-volume prestige cars, but he thought the retractable hardtop was a good gimmick with obvious showroom appeal. At his behest, the Skyliner earned an encore appearance for 1959, now as part of the new top-of-the-line Galaxie series.
Although Ford's overall sales improved markedly in 1959 -- thanks in part to buyer distaste for the gaudy "batwing" '59 Chevy -- Skyliner sales slipped further, to 12,915. The Skyliner did make one other important contribution to the '59s, however; its squared-off, "formal' roof shape was adapted for the rest of the Galaxie line, which accounted for an impressive percentage of Ford's total sales that year.
McNamara was apparently prepared to sign off on a fourth year for the Skyliner, but the 1960 big cars had a new semi-fastback roof that would have been a challenge to adapt to retractable form. With such modest sales, it didn't make sense, and 1959 would be the end of the line. Many aspects of the top mechanism were subsequently reused for the convertible versions of the Lincoln Continental and Ford Thunderbird, albeit with a canvas top.
REBIRTH
It took many years for the retractable hardtop to make a reappearance. Buyer enthusiasm for open cars in general waned throughout the sixties. With new safety regulations threatening the existence of all convertibles, the expense and complexity of a 'retrac' were hard to justify, and buyer interest turned to sunroofs.
When convertibles began to make a comeback in the mid-eighties, manufacturers farmed out much of the work to independent specialists like the American Sunroof Company (ASC). In the early 1990s, ASC president Heinz Prechter approached the Japanese manufacturer Mitsubishi about producing a retractable hardtop version of the 3000GT sports coupe. The resultant 3000GT Spyder debuted in 1994. It was conceptually similar to the old Skyliner, although its roof mechanism used hydraulic pumps, as well as electric motors, and was controlled by a computer chip. It was faster than the Ford system, capable of raising or lowering in only 19 seconds. It was still heavy, though, adding more than 300 pounds (136 kg) to the car's already bulky curb weight. The retractable hardtop also nearly doubled the 3000GT's sticker price -- which reached a towering $65,424 in turbocharged VR4 form.
The 3000GT Spyder was short-lived, lasting only two model years and accounting for a mere 1,034 sales, but it made quite a splash. From a technological standpoint, it was more impressive than Mercedes-Benz's SL roadsters, which, despite their fully automated operation, were only soft tops. That was not a challenge Daimler-Benz was prepared to take lightly. In 1997, they responded with the SLK230, a compact roadster with a neatly packaged folding steel roof. The SLK was not cheap, starting at around $40,000 in the U.S., but it was significantly cheaper than the Mitsubishi, and relatively attainable.
Although it was criticized for its uninspiring handling and lackluster engines, the 1998-2004 SLK (known to Mercedes as the R170) launched a new interest in relatively affordable retractable hardtops. During Daimler-Benz's ill-fated marriage with Chrysler, the R170 platform became the basis of Chrysler's ZH platform, used for the 2004-2008 Chrysler Crossfire.
The Mercedes SLK soon opened the floodgates. In 2001, Peugeot introduced a hardtop convertible version of its 206 compact, the 206CC (for "Coupé Convertible), ostensibly based on the old Georges Paulin Éclipse Décapotable system. The 206CC was the first retractable hardtop in many years to be priced within the reach of mere mortals. It was followed by a host of "CCs" from Lexus, Volvo, Daihatsu, Mazda, Opel, Chrysler, Pontiac, Cadillac, BMW, and others. Even Ford has recently returned to the retractable hardtop game with the Pininfarina-styled Focus CC, although it isn't currently slated for U.S. sales.
As with the Skyliner, the modern 'retracs' offer top-down convenience and top-up security, but with substantial penalties in cost, weight, and complexity. Cunning engineering has addressed some of the Skyliner's packaging issues, but at a considerable cost, and when the clever mechanisms go awry, fixing them is daunting. (Observe the rotating backlight glass of the current Mercedes SL and imagine what would happen if it jammed at the wrong moment.) Most also incur substantial weigh penalties. Mazda's MX-5 hardtop, whose roof is made of polycarbonate, adds only 77 lb (35 kg), but Volvo's C70 incurs a penalty of some 440 pounds (200 kg). Such extra mass is enough to significantly harm both performance and fuel economy (and consequently carbon dioxide output). The "CCs" are also expensive, at a time when the economy is again going to pot.
In the last decade, however, the retractable hardtop has gone from oddity to ubiquity. The original Skyliner never really had a chance to establish a market niche for itself, after the initial novelty wore off. Today, there are enough retractable-hardtop models that even if many of them fail, they have probably established buyer expectations that will ensure the survival of the genre.
We are not terribly fond of retracs, or of convertibles in general -- we'd rather see a broader return of the lighter, more attractive, more sensible pillarless hardtop coupe -- but we are forced to conclude that the old Skyliner is an idea whose time has finally come.
# # #
NOTES ON SOURCES
Our principal sources for this article were Ray Thursby's article "Retracing the Retractable's Steps: The Tale of Ford's 1957-1959 Skyliner" from the June 2003 issue of Collectible Automobile (Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 8-23) and Jack Nerad's "Ford Skyliner" from Driving Today (date unknown, http://www.antiquecar.com/gc_ford_skyliner.php, accessed 22 April 2009). We also consulted the untitled and uncredited 1957 Ford road test in the January 1957 issue of Motor Trend, reprinted in R.M. Clarke's Ford Automobiles 1949-1959 (Brooklands Series) (Cobham, Surrey: Brooklands Books Ltd., 1990).
Background information on the Mitsubishi 3000GT Spyder came from "Stow-Away" by Mark Vaughn, from the April 1994 issue of Autoweek; "Mitsubishi 3000GT Spyder" by Kevin Smith, from the June 1994 issue of Car and Driver; and "Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 Spyder" by Steve Spence, from the November 1995 issue of Car and Driver.
Many people don't know that Ford was good in technology or gimmickry. The Ford Skyliner could be called a landmark of a car for Ford.
I was just wondering... I've heard that the Skyliners' rectrac mechanism are very unreliable, with the the electric motors and things like that could break down, or come to be jammed... Well that's what some people tell me.
2009-04-27 02:00:54
|
Administrator
My understanding is that the Skyliner mechanism was surprisingly reliable, particularly given its era. It was complicated, but the motors were lightly stressed, and the mechanism was easy to access. (If you look at the photos, you'll see that most of the components are fairly easy to reach.) If a motor failed, the automatic mechanism wouldn't work, but you could still manually crank the roof open or closed. Parts are apparently not difficult to come by, either.
I've heard that about 2,500 of the 50,000 or so Skyliners made still survive, which isn't a bad total.
2009-04-30 13:10:12
|
keeton
Thanks for another great article! The Skyliner retractable was an instant classic.
When you started talking about modern HT convertibles, you did not mention the Lexus SC430. I attended the Paris auto show in 2000 and vividly remember seeing the SC430 on display - I believe it's introduction was at this show. About every 15 minutes or so a booth bunny would come out and cycle the top. A crowd would immediately swarm around the display staring in amazement. Unlike the SLK, the SC430's top was pretty reliable and probably did more to reestablish the viability of the HT convertible than any of the Euros.
2009-04-30 13:49:47
|
Administrator
Quote:
When you started talking about modern HT convertibles, you did not mention the Lexus SC430.
True -- that one slipped my mind when I was contemplating the long list of modern retracs.
I think the Peugeot 206CC was more important, though. Its top certainly wasn't as reliable (something they've allegedly fixed by now), but it really established the commercial viability of a mass-market retractable hardtop. The SC430 was well engineered, but it was also a $56,000 car, sold in very modest numbers. If it had been the only retractable hardtop on the market besides the SLK, I don't know that it would have been that influential -- once it died out, it might not have prompted a successor.
(I must admit I'm biased, because I really liked the original Lexus SC/Toyota Soarer, and I found the SC430 aesthetically dubious. But then, I'm not very fond of convertibles.)
2009-05-01 03:55:31
|
Dean
I've always wondered if the elegant retractable T-Bird and Lincoln convertible tops of a few years later were a result of the Skyliner technology.
2009-05-27 06:01:00
|
Woofer
This is a great article. I saw a Skyliner at White Post many years ago and I was very impressed. I am wondering why no automaker has tried a "tambour" top that would retract like a tambour door, along fixed rails like the old Nash convertibles. Modern materials could make this safe and it might be possible to retract in motion, although that might not be safest approach.
2009-05-27 13:28:15
|
Administrator
The problem with roll-up tambour-style tops, as Studebaker discovered with the Lark Wagonaire in the early sixties, is that top sealing is a real problem. Studebaker could never solve it, and owners of survivors just accept that the wagon WILL leak when it rains. A canvas top like the Nash Rambler Custom Landau won't necessarily leak (because a lot of the issue is between the segments of a Wagonaire's steel roof), but I guess it seems less practical than the oversize moonroofs that have become popular in recent years -- many of the problems of a convertible without the open-air feel.
2009-11-01 17:49:26
|
John
- Ford Skyliner Top Mechanism
The Skyliner top mechanism was very reliable. It had been tested for over a year before it was marketed. The problems came about from over-enthusiastic and proud owners who would stop the mechanism half-way through a down-or-up cycle, and then reverse it. The procedure was to let it complete a cycle first. Likewise when we see dramatic pictures of Skyliners with their tops in "still motion" the car is having undue stress put upon the system.
When operated according to directions and serviced by maintenance personnel who follow the guidelines, the Skyliner is very reliable and performs just as it was engineered to do. The really remarkable thing about the Skyliner was not necessarily the top works itself, but rather that it was priced within reach of 80% of the car buyers in 1957. Introduced in April 1957, six months after the start of the mode year, it captured 4th place among all "convertible" sales.
The basic concept of the Skyliner's top was incorporated into the 1958-1966 Thunderbird and 1961-1967 Lincoln Convertibles. 1958-1960 Lincoln Convertibles were even more unique with their power-operated glass reverse slant back window and special fully-automatic self-storing top compartment.
See www.lovefords.org for more information and pictures about all the Disappearing Top cars from Ford.
2009-11-01 18:05:06
|
Administrator
I wonder if the relatively modest price of the Skyliner is part of the reason it didn't last very long -- given its complexity, its production cost was undoubtedly very high.
I think its greatest problem for owners, ultimately, was the limited practicality, which is a problem for the Thunderbird convertible, as well -- with the top down, there's almost no usable trunk space at all.
2009-11-01 18:15:33
|
John
- Skyliner longevity
The main reason for the Skyliner not being built in 1960 (and beyond) was that the new body style would not handle the Skyliner's mechanism which needed extra length and a shortened passenger compartment. The tooling for a second size Ford was not deemed cost-effective for 1960, especially with the Falcon being introduced and completely new Thunderbird and Lincoln cars already planned for the following year.
Trunk space is a worthy observation however not really a factor. Few people went on long trips where they needed full trunks and then drove with the top down. Still it was a popular criticism of the day, mostly by GM and Chrysler fans who had nothing to write home about.
2009-11-01 18:11:18
|
John
- 1957 Ford Skyliner Engines
The 272 V-8 was not available in the Skyliner, or any other Fairlane/Fairlane 500/Station Wagon models for 1957. The 272 V-8 was optional for and available only on the Custom and Custom 300. The 292 V-8 was optional on all Fairlane, Fairlane 500, and Station Wagon models except the Skyliner - it was the standard base engine on the Skyliner. The 312 engines (4V, 2-4V, and Supecharged) were optional on all 1957 Ford Custom/Custom 300/Fairlane/Fairlane 500/Station Wagon models. The 223-cubic inch "Mileage Maker Six" was standard on all 1957 Fords except for the Skyliner.
Ah, I hadn't realized the 292 was standard on Skyliners. I made that correction.
2009-11-01 18:31:14
|
John
It's an obscure fact for sure about the engines.
Ford used to use some great names for the engines, and virtually every year changed to add new marketing appeal. The 272 was called the "Ford V-8". The 292 was the "Thunderbird V-8", whilst the 312 was the "Thunderbird Special V-8". Although 1957 was relatively straightforward in this approach, in subsequent years the term "Thunderbird" was applied to many engines that were never installed in Thunderbirds; that word became a marketing highlight of its own irrespective of the car from which its name was derived.
2009-11-01 18:32:03
|
John
It's an obscure fact for sure about the engines.
Ford used to use some great names for the engines, and virtually every year changed to add new marketing appeal. The 272 was called the "Ford V-8". The 292 was the "Thunderbird V-8", while the 312 was the "Thunderbird Special V-8". Although 1957 was relatively straightforward in this approach, in subsequent years the term "Thunderbird" was applied to many engines that were never installed in Thunderbirds; that word became a marketing highlight of its own irrespective of the car from which its name was derived.
(Cobham, Surrey: Brooklands Books Ltd., 1990).
(Bennington, VT: Hemmings Motor News, 2000); and Tim Howley, "1954 Mercury Sun Valley: Let the Sunshine In," from Special Interest Autos #113 (September-October 1989), reprinted in Richard A. Lentinello, ed., The Hemmings Book of Mercurys: Drive Reports from Special Interest Autos Magazine (Hemmings Motor News Collector-Car Books)
(Bennington, VT: Hemmings Motor News, 2002).
Many people don't know that Ford was good in technology or gimmickry. The Ford Skyliner could be called a landmark of a car for Ford.
I was just wondering... I've heard that the Skyliners' rectrac mechanism are very unreliable, with the the electric motors and things like that could break down, or come to be jammed... Well that's what some people tell me.