Cheaper by the Dozen: The Curious Story of Packard's Twin Six and Twelve PDF Print E-mail

Tags: 1910 | 1920s | 1930s | American cars | Cadillac | luxury cars | Packard

Written by Aaron Severson   
Saturday, 26 June 2010 00:00

In January 1930, Cadillac introduced its mighty Sixteen, a bold and extravagant bid for supremacy in the luxury car field. Naturally, the Packard Motor Car Company, the reigning champion of the American luxury market, was not about to take that lying down, and launched its own 12-cylinder Twin Six in 1932.

It would be easy to assume the Twin Six was a hastily contrived response to the multicylinder Cadillacs, but that's only half true. The latter-day Twin Six was conceived for quite a different purpose, and therein hangs a tale.

This week, we look at the curious history of Packard's legendary V-12 cars, with sideways glances at Cord and...the Indianapolis 500? Read on...

1936 Packard Twelve convertible coupe badge

THE FIRST TWIN SIX

In today's automotive market, when eight cylinders is considered the ante for most serious luxury cars, it may be disconcerting to think that a hundred years ago, four cylinders was considered a luxury. Packard's earliest cars had one-cylinder engines, as did early Cadillacs. The development of Packard's first four, the 1903 Model K, was a matter of some internal controversy; some Packard executives felt the company should concentrate on cheaper one-cylinder runabouts. By 1906, however, Packard had dropped its one- and two-cylinder engines in favor of a T-head inline four of mammoth displacement, initially 350 cu. in. (5.7 L), soon increased to 432 cu. in. (7.1 L). This was supplemented in 1909 by the cheaper Model 18, powered by a 266 cu. in. (4.4 L) four.

Packard apparently contemplated an inline six as early as 1905, although it didn't go on sale until April 1911. Dubbed "Six" (later "48," from its taxable horsepower rating), it was again a T-head engine of gargantuan dimensions, some 525 cu. in. (8.6 L), developing 74 hp (55 kW). A smaller and somewhat cheaper six, the "38," followed a year and a half later. This was an L-head (flathead) engine, making 60 hp (45 kW) from 415 cu. in. (6.8 L); it sold for about $600 less than its larger brother. (It's notable as the first Packard engine with an electric starter, which Cadillac had pioneered a year earlier.)

1910 Packard Model 30 engine
The engine that preceded Packard's first sixes was this massive T-head four, seen here in a 1910 Model 30 Gentleman's Runabout. With a 5-inch (127-mm) bore and 5.5-inch (139.7-mm) stroke, it displaced 432 cu. in. (7.1 L) and developed about 30 hp (22 kW). The cheaper Model 18, introduced in 1908, was 266 cu. in. (4.4 L), rated at 18 hp (13 kW).

Both sixes were adequately powerful, but Jesse Vincent, who became Packard's chief engineer in 1912 and VP of engineering in 1915, was not satisfied. Both of Packard's sixes were huge, and to make them bigger -- the surest way to produce more power -- would make them prohibitive heavy. As it was, their wide bore (4.0 in/101.2 mm for the 38, 4.5 in/114.3 mm for the 48) required a long, heavy crankshaft and a massive flywheel. Vincent wanted an engine with a shorter, lighter crankshaft that would allow a large displacement, while keeping the swept volume of each cylinder relatively modest, for greater smoothness.

Smoothness was a particular concern. In those days, automobile engines were generally bolted directly to the frame; vibration-damping engine mounts were years in the future. One of the attractions of the straight six is its inherent balance -- the forces exerted by the pistons and connecting rods cancel each other out, so there's none of the shake that afflicts inline two-, three-, four-, and five-cylinder engines. Vincent was loathe to sacrifice that balance, which led him to eschew the V8 layout that Cadillac adopted in 1914. A straight eight, meanwhile, would have the same problems of weight and crankshaft size as a bigger six.

The solution, which Vincent pitched to the Packard board in early 1913, was a V-12. Since the V-12 was, as Vincent explained, essentially two straight sixes with a common crankcase, it preserved the six's inherent balance and smoothness. It also provided comparable displacement, while keeping the swept volume of each cylinder modest.

That first Packard V-12, dubbed "Twin Six," displaced 424 cu. in. (7.0 L). Its cylinder banks were set at a 60-degree angle, providing even firing intervals and making it narrower than a 90-degree V8. Like the smaller six of the "38," it was an L-head engine, but it had two camshafts, avoiding the need for rocker arms. In the mode of European high-performance engines of its day, it had a narrow bore, 3.0 in (76.2 mm), and a long stroke, 5.0 in (127 mm), allowing the crankshaft to be shorter, more rigid, and considerably lighter than the six; Packard claimed the Twin Six weighed 400 lb (181 kg) less than the six-cylinder "48." Despite its smaller displacement, the V-12 was slightly more powerful than the six -- 85 hp (63 kW) at 3,000 rpm, compared to 82 hp (61 kW) at 1,720 rpm for the "48" -- with twice the torque.

1917 Packard 2-25Coupe Twin Six badge Infrogmation
The grille badge of a 1917 Second Series (2-25) Packard Twin Six coupe. The Second Series, introduced in August 1916, added removable cylinder heads and a revised cooling system, along with various chassis refinements. A coupe like this one originally cost $4,265; it rode a 126.5-inch (3,213-mm) wheelbase, and weighed around 4,500 lb (2,045 kg). (Photo © 2008 Infrogmation, cropped and slightly retouched by the author; used and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license)

The Twin Six was introduced in May 1915 as a 1916 model, and immediately became a sensation. Although Packards were too big and too heavy to be considered true performance cars, in July 1915, race car driver Ralph De Palma lapped the Chicago Speedway in a Twin Six touring car at an average speed of 72.7 mph (117.1 kph), a formidable showing. The V-12 was also adept at that favorite test of prewar motoring, pulling from 3 mph (5 kph) to top speed in high gear.

The V-12 sold quite well, doing wonders for Packard's bottom line. Between 1917 and 1919, the company's net profits were around $5.5 million a year. The Twin Six completely overshadowed the six-cylinder cars, which were discontinued in September 1915.

The Twin Six remained in production through June 1923, with various minor refinements along the way. Packard sold 35,102 of them in all, a remarkable total for such an expensive car. It also inspired, at least in part, the 12-cylinder "Liberty Engine" used in many Allied aircraft and tanks; Jesse Vincent helped to design the Liberty, along with Elbert John Hall of the Hall-Scott Motor Company.

The end of World War 1 left the European economies in ruins, and led to a severe recession in the U.S. Even before the Armistice, Packard president Alvan Macauley decided it would be prudent to offer a smaller, cheaper model. This emerged in September 1920 as the Single Six, powered by a new 242 cu. in. (4.0 L) L-head six with 52 hp (39 kW). Although the Single Six was a sales disappointment -- in part because it still cost a lot more than a V8 Cadillac -- it outsold the costlier Twin Six, whose sales fell from over 5,000 in 1920 to a bit over 1,300 in 1921. By 1922, it was clear the V-12 had run its course.

1919 Packard 3-35 7p Touring front 3q Cliff1066
A 1919 Packard Twin Six seven-passenger touring car. Even for luxury cars, open bodies were far more common than closed models during this period, largely because of price: this car originally cost $3,850, compared to $5,400 for the closed 3-35 Limousine. The 1917-1923 models, known as the Third Series (a designation Packard subsequently reused a few years later), were the final iteration of the Twin Six, which now had 90 hp (67 kW). (Photo © 2008 cliff1066™; used under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license)

Packard considered developing a new Twin Six, but opted instead for a straight eight, essentially the Single Six engine with two more cylinders and a heavier, nine-bearing crankshaft. The eight initially displaced 358 cu. in. (5.9 L), but it made 85 hp (63 kW), nearly matching the 90 hp (67 kW) of the final Twin Six. Dubbed "Single Eight," the new engine replaced the V-12 in the summer of 1923. The Single Eight, renamed simply Eight in 1925, would become Packard's mainstay for the next decade.

Packard would return to the Twin Six concept seven years later, but the new V-12 was planned for a very different market and a very different configuration. If all had gone as planned, it would have become Packard's first front-wheel-drive car.

1928 Packard Custom Eight Model 443 phaeton front 3q
A Packard Custom Eight dual-windshield phaeton of the Fourth Series, 1927-1928. It's powered by the 385 cu. in. (6.3 L) straight eight, with 106 hp (79 kW). This car was originally priced at just under $4,000, decreased by about $100 in early 1928. Dual sidemounts were standard equipment, although in March 1928, Packard introduced a cheaper "Standard" series with rear-mounted spares. The Fourth Series was the last year for the Six, a 289 cu. in. (4.7 L) engine with 81 hp (60 kW); Packard would not offer another Six until 1937.


Comments (8)
  • Administrator

    An excellent point. Packard's marine engines, used in wartime PT boats, were V-12s, also.

  • CodyJarrett

    Thankyou for including pictures of the motor you have chosen to highlight this week. Now if you could only publish those pictures of all those automatic transmissions you wrote about a few weeks ago.

  • Peter Hartmann  - CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN THE CURIOUS STORY

    It is fascinating how determined some folks are to "sell the story" that the Packard Twelve and Super Eight "shared the same chassis".

    What possible advantage is there to trying to re-structure history, meaning "fake it"?

    First of all, while Packard CALLED the 1937-1939 Packard "senior" eight cylinder cars "Super Eights", of course they were not; the "REAL" 384 cu. in. motor was discarded in place of the smaller, cheaper, and much less powerful "Standard Eight".

    To suggest that there wasn't much performance difference between the standard 320. cu. in "L" head eight, and the 473 "wedge-shaped combustion chamber" Twelve, with its vastly more modern, more sophisticated, and larger "breathing" capability, tells us more about the writer's objectives, than it does about the two cars.

    In fact, the much more powerful Twelves required heavier brakes, suspension components, and wheels. True, the "seniors" all used the same exterior sheet metal, but underneath were quite different automobiles, with significant performance differences.

    Oh well - i guess if you have to sell used cars, any silly story will do if it gets the iron off the lot....!

  • Administrator

    The use of the term "chassis" on p. 4 of the story was perhaps misleading; "wheelbase" is more correct, and the text has been amended accordingly. Yes, the Twelve had heavier components to deal with its greater weight and performance -- only a small portion of the weight difference between it and the Super Eight was attributable to the engine itself.

    I don't dispute that the Twelve was significantly more powerful and more sophisticated than the contemporary eights. However, against that greater power was balanced the much greater weights of the Twelve, which according to Packard's own figures exceeded the Super Eight by 700 lb or more, body for body. If there were figures available for comparable acceleration times and top speeds, I would happily include them here, but the sort of track testing that became ubiquitous later was not yet common at the time, so there are not vast sets of road test figures to consult. However, the power-to-weight ratios are not as different as the power outputs.

    Much of the information on the body and chassis changes to the Twelve came from A. Leslie, Jr., "Cloaking the Ultimate in Conveyances: Twin Six and Twelve Coachwork, The Ninth through the Seventeenth Series 1932-1939," in Kimes. If you can provide reputable alternate sources, I would be happy to consult them and revise the text as needed.

    The author has no "objective" other than to recount the history of these cars in a reasonably accurate fashion, and is puzzled by the allegation that he would somehow benefit from misrepresenting the facts.

  • pennsycarfan

    Both the 120 and the Twelve are impressive cars. The problem with preferring one over the other is that, in the end, Packard needed both types of vehicle to survive.

    The 120 was an impressive car in its own right, but it was the "Senior" Packards - especially the custom-body Twelves - that gave it prestige.

    When the 120 debuted, it was a huge success, but a big part of the reason was that upper-middle income people were excited about being able to buy a car with a very prestigious name. That image had been forged by the luxurious, very well built, and superbly engineered, Twelves and Eights.

    Imagine today if Rolls-Royce came out with a very well-made and well-engineered car that cost $50-55,000 and featured the traditional grille and hood ornament. People would be lining up around the block to buy one, even in this rotten economy.

    The problem was that once the Twelves were gone, and the 120 became the company's bread-and-butter, Packard's survival depended on selling cars to a different type of customer. Traditional Packard customers were ultra-conservative when it came to new styling and engineering features. The 120 competed against the Buick, and those buyers expected flashy performance and up-to-the-minute styling (not to mention relatively frequent facelifts and body changes).

    Packard wanted to sell lots of medium-price cars, but wanted to do it the old-fashioned way, using approaches to styling and engineering that had worked for the "Senior" cars. That wasn't going to work anymore, especially during the postwar years, when GM wowed the public with new engines, body styles and styling features.

    An ultra-luxurious, "utlimate" Packard in the vein of the prewar Twelve would have at least reminded people about what the Packard name once meant.

  • Andrew Buc  - A 7.1-liter I4?

    Even if the bar for refinement was lower in 1906, I'd think this would be unacceptably rough. Perhaps it was offset by low rotational speed?

  • Administrator

    I heard it running, and while it was obviously no Lexus, it didn't strike me as any rougher than, say, a diesel bus engine. I don't think its peak speed was more than about 2,000 rpm, so that probably helped, and it was obviously meticulously built.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.