Blogads button

blog advertising is good for you
Longlife Button Banner
American Muscle Banner

Editorials and Commentary

Find Us on Facebook

Sponsor icon

Slickcar.com is the auto accessory superstore, offering the latest in car and truck performance parts.

User Login



Auto Parts Nerd

Search Ate Up With Motor

FTC Disclosure Notice


Paid advertising and sponsored links on Ate Up With Motor are identified with the words "Sponsor," "Sponsors," or "Sponsored Links." In the event we receive any other compensation or consideration for any content herein, the nature of that compensation will be disclosed on the final page of the article or content, or otherwise adjacent to it. See the Terms of Use for important additional information regarding Ate Up With Motor's advertising and commercial endorsements.


Designed by
SiteGround web hosting Joomla Templates
Wide Track: Bunkie Knudsen, Pete Estes, and the Pontiac Renaissance Print E-mail

Tags: 1950s | 1960s | American cars | Bunkie Knudsen | John DeLorean | orphan | Pontiac

Written by Aaron Severson   
Saturday, 17 July 2010 00:00

In 1956, GM's Pontiac Motor Division was close to death. Its sales were down, its market share declining, and its image at a low ebb. That summer, however, help arrived in the form of Bunkie Knudsen, Pete Estes, and John DeLorean. Together, they lifted Pontiac out of its mid-fifties doldrums and put it on track for its unprecedented success in the 1960s.

This week, we look back at the reign of Bunkie Knudsen and the birth of the legendary Wide-Track Pontiacs.

1957 Pontiac Star Chief wheelcover

THE BIRTH OF PONTIAC

For years, if you asked Pontiac executives when the division was founded, they would tell you 1909, the year the Oakland Motor Car Company became a division of General Motors. The Pontiac brand, however, was born in the economic boom of the mid-1920s, part of GM president Alfred P. Sloan's plan to fill the gaps between the corporation's various makes by giving each division a complementary "companion make." Cadillac was paired with LaSalle, Buick with Marquette, Oldsmobile with Viking, and Oakland with Pontiac, which took its name from Pontiac, Michigan (where Oakland was headquartered) and Chief Pontiac, the 18th-century Ottawa leader whose stylized likeness became the new car's mascot.

The original Pontiac was one of GM's first exercises in what we would now call platform sharing. It was based on the contemporary Chevrolet, sharing much of its running gear, but it was somewhat bigger, with a distinct appearance and a new 187 cu. in. (3.1 L) six-cylinder engine. Since the Chevrolet had only a four, the Pontiac had little difficulty justifying its $180 price premium, and it quickly became very successful. By the time of the Crash, it was GM's second best-selling marque.

1929 Pontiac Big Six Laundaulette front 3q Lars-Göran Lindgren
Pontiac received its first real redesign in 1929; it was bigger than the initial 1927-1928 model, and the engine was bored and stroked to 200 cu. in. (3.3 L), giving 57 hp (43 kW) at 3,000 rpm. This was the first Pontiac to be designed under the auspices of Harley Earl's new Art & Colour Section. (Photo © 2007 Lars-Göran Lindgren; used under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic license)


By 1931, with the U.S. economy in ruins, Oakland and Pontiac were moribund, and GM seriously considered terminating them both. Sloan still saw a need for a mid-priced brand between Chevrolet and Oldsmobile, however, and since Pontiac was now outselling Oakland by more than five to one, it seemed to have the better future. In 1932, GM abandoned the Oakland brand, and the division was officially renamed the Pontiac Motor Division.

Although the Depression was a difficult time for every automaker, Pontiac sales recovered by mid-decade, thanks to increased commonality with Chevrolet, a newly optional straight eight, and attractive new styling. It was not a flashy or exciting car, but it represented good value for money, and it was consistently in fifth place in overall automotive sales, occasionally reaching as high as fourth.

Pontiac soon earned a reputation as GM's most conservative division. General manager Harry Klingler, who led Pontiac for 19 years, emphasized durability and dependability over frills, and chief engineer Ben Anibal had no interest in technical fillips like Buick's Compound Carburetion or Oldsmobile's Hydra-Matic. (Pontiac did not introduce Hydra-Matic until 1948, the year after Anibal retired.)

1937 Pontiac Deluxe sedan front 3q
A 1937 Pontiac DeLuxe Six sedan. Although Pontiac offered both a 223 cu. in. (3.7 L) six and a 249 cu. in. (4.1 L) eight, most Depression-era buyers preferred the six, which was somewhat cheaper. The 1937 model was the last to be designed under Frank Hershey, who left the Pontiac studio for Buick in 1935. He was replaced by Virgil Exner, Sr., whose designs for Chrysler would shake up GM Design in the fifties. (Photo © 2009 Charles01; released to the public domain by the photographer)

That conservatism served Pontiac well in the thirties, and it was no particular handicap in the postwar sales boom. Pontiacs were nicely styled, reasonably priced, and reliable, with a lengthy list of factory and dealer accessories to fatten its profit margins.

It was not until the Korean War that Pontiac began to stumble. Wartime restrictions on production and consumer credit caused 1951 sales to fall nearly 20%, and another 26% for 1952. When the restrictions were lifted, Pontiac sales recovered, but its market share remained static, while GM's other brands grew at impressive rates. By 1954, Pontiac was more than 150,000 units behind Buick and about 65,000 units behind Oldsmobile, despite its rivals' higher prices. Pontiac still enjoyed volume of which the independents could only dream, but something was clearly wrong.

1949 Pontiac Streamliner Eight front 3q
The 1949 models were Pontiac's first postwar restyling, although they still offered fastback styling, introduced in 1941. Fastbacks were called Streamliners; notchbacks, Chieftains. Both were available with either the six or the straight eight.

THE PONTIAC V8

Pontiac's general manager in the early fifties was Robert Critchfield, previously the general manager of the Delco-Remy division and, briefly, Allison. Critchfield was a manager of solid managerial talent and no particular interest in automobiles. By the early fifties, that was not uncommon at GM -- ambitious executives vied for general manager slots because they were a stepping-stone to more-senior executive positions, rather than out of any great desire to build cars. Nonetheless, in later interviews with historians Jan Norbye and Jim Dunne, some Pontiac staffers expressed a certain resentment at the fact that Critchfield was not a "car guy."

1949 Pontiac Streamliner Eight badge
The postwar "Silver Streak 8" was little changed from its prewar form, still displacing 249 cu. in. (4.1 L). It now made 104 hp (78 kW) with manual transmission, 108 hp (81 kW) with Hydra-Matic.

It's tempting to blame Critchfield for Pontiac's slump, but by the time he arrived in 1952, the styling for the 1955 models was well under way, and many major engineering decisions had already been made. Perhaps the most critical of those was the decision to delay the launch of Pontiac's new OHV V8 engine. The division's engineering staff had been working on the new engine since 1946, and it would have been ready for the 1953 model year, but chief engineer George Delaney had asked for an extra two years to resolve some design and manufacturing issues.

Delaney's concerns about reliability and production costs were commendable, but the lack of a V8 certainly hurt Pontiac in 1953 and 1954. The mid-priced market was becoming tougher, and Pontiac was being squeezed both from below -- with models like Chevy's plush Bel Air -- and from above; Buick's entry-level Special was priced to compete with the Pontiac Eight.

1952 Pontiac  Chieftain Eight front 3q
A 1952 Pontiac, still sporting the division's trademark Silver Streaks. The driver didn't stick around long enough for us to confirm this model's identity, but the odds are that it's a Chieftain Eight DeLuxe, the most popular '52 Pontiac by a significant margin. The old flathead straight eight was now up to 268 cu. in. (4.4 L), making either 118 or 122 hp (88 or 91 kW); the latter was standard with Hydra-Matic, which most buyers preferred.

Pontiac's new V8 finally debuted for the 1955 model year. It was a fairly orthodox design, with cast iron block and heads and pushrod-operated overhead valves. (It was not the division's first V8 engine; back in 1932, Pontiac had briefly offered a 251 cu. in. (4.1 L) V8 with a flat-plane crank, inherited from Oakland.) It had two novel features: reverse-flow cooling (pumping coolant through the heads and then the block, rather than the other way around) and an unusual "Ball-Pivot" valvegear layout.


Comments (8)
  • bob merritt

    Great, informative article, as usual...but, the last page needs reformating as text is cut off on the right.

  • Administrator

    Okay, I figured out the problem. It appears to be fixed in both Firefox and IE, although you might have to clear your temporary internet files to get it to reload properly.

  • gottacook  - The 1965-66 cars

    As the longtime owner (1974-91) of a '66 Bonneville convertible, I think you should have mentioned that the 1965 redesign increased the proportions of the larger full-size cars (i.e., the Star Chief and Bonneville series except for the Safari wagons) to about those of 1959-60: Mine had a 124-inch wheelbase and a total length of 222 inches.

    (Also, the '66 in the photo has the BONNEVILLE grille lettering much to close to the center of the car for some reason; the first photo returned by a Google Images search of "1966 bonneville" shows the correct placement.)

    Thanks for all the detail about the pre-Wide Track period, as well as the reference list.

  • Administrator

    That's a reasonable note. I had wanted to mention the larger dimensions, but there wasn't an easy way to include it in the text; I added it to the caption.

    I have no explanation of the offset grille lettering on the red Bonneville. Maybe it was missing when the owner got the car, and he or she wasn't sure exactly where it was supposed to go -- I don't know.

  • Harry Smith

    First off, another interesing article.

    However I am still having the problem with the text formatting on the last page. I read your articles on my iPhone so I thought it was just the iPhone. It formats correctly on my iPad. I have had the same problem with some other recent articles, always on the last page. But I keep coming back anyway.

    Oh, and in the photo caption where you detail the expansion on Pontiac's V8 there is some apparently unintended repetititon.

  • Administrator

    Thanks for the tip on the photo caption -- fixed.

    My apologizes for the formatting problem. What appears to be happening is that certain browsers are objecting to the text links; some browsers refuse to wrap text that looks like a link, which is breaking the margin. I managed to fix it in IE, and I tinkered with it a little more just now, but the smaller window of mobile phone browsers may still present problems. I just found out about this last night, so I haven't had a chance to address it in previous articles.

  • pennsycarfan

    Nice article. One question - I had always heard that the X-frame was pretty stiff. Given that GM sold large numbers of four-door hardtops, I would think that a willowy frame would have allowed those bodies to quickly twist themselves apart.

    The big problem with the X-frame was lack of side-impact protection. I've seen Ford ads from 1961 comparing the full-size Ford frame with the X-frame (without ever mentioning Chevrolet or GM) to make an obvious point regarding safety.

    What is interesting about Pontiac is that, after about 1963 or so, it achieved success in spite of, not because of, GM's top management. GM's executive team fought Pontiac management on several key issues, even as the division was setting sales records and had a great reputation. In some respects, Pontiac was the BMW of the 1960s, in terms of image and the demographics of customers who bought the cars.

  • Administrator

    The X-frame itself was relatively stiff -- not quite as stiff as a full ladder frame with X-member, but stiffer than the later perimeter frames. The big problem was that it didn't do a very good job of preventing the body itself from twisting, which a big hardtop generally does very readily.

    Pontiac's pitch in the sixties was very similar to the one BMW adopted later, and when Pontiac returned to that message in the eighties and nineties, they positioned themselves pretty deliberately as the poor man's BMW. Pontiac's demographics were not that much like BMW's; they skewed a good deal younger. Both were selling sportiness, but a lot of customers bought BMWs because they were expensive and prestigious, much more so than with Pontiac.

    The late fifties really marked the beginning of GM's efforts to exert tighter corporate control on the divisions. The senior compacts were really the first salvo, and I think the corporation was frustrated that those cars ended up having so little in common. Senior management kept pushing for more commonality, and more control over divisional operations. One of my sources said that in 1960, a general manager might have to meet with senior management once a month to check in; in 1969, they had to attend corporate meetings at least once or twice a week.

    Even in the early fifties, GM senior management lived in mortal fear of the feds. Their primary fear was the anti-trust division of the Justice Department -- they were terrified of being split up, or being forced to spin off Chevrolet -- but they also feared federal regulation. There were already growing safety and emissions lobbies in the early sixties, even before Ralph Nader, and GM was afraid of doing anything that might appear provocative or irresponsible. Pontiac's success put them in an awkward position. They were pleased about the increased sales, but some senior executives felt that Pontiac was putting the whole corporation at risk with childish stunts. They kept wishing there was a way to maintain the sales while taking a quieter, more dignified, less provocative approach.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Please note that user comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ate Up With Motor, and we accept no responsibility for their content. Publication of a comment does not constitute Ate Up With Motor's endorsement of any opinion, product, or service. Please click here to read our Comment Policy.