Model Histories
Terms and Technology
Editorials and Commentary
Contact Us
User Login
Support Ate Up With Motor
Search Ate Up With Motor
FTC Disclosure Notice
| Hotchkiss Drive |
|
|
| Written by Aaron Severson |
| Sunday, 22 March 2009 00:00 |
|
Another term we have thrown around a lot that bears some explanation is Hotchkiss drive. This is a suspension layout very common on front-engine/rear-drive cars and trucks from the 1920s until the late 1970s, and still used on many pick-up trucks and SUVs. Many rear-drive cars and trucks use a live axle at the rear -- that is, the rear axle incorporates the differential and halfshafts into a single rigid unit that moves up and down with the rear wheels. Live axles are cheap and rugged, and they ensure that the camber of both rear wheels remains constant as the wheels move through their suspension travel. (The main drawback of live axles is that they are heavy, and that mass is part of the vehicle's unsprung weight, which is detrimental to ride and handling.)
A live axle must be located -- that is, its movements in all planes must be limited -- and it requires some means of transmitting the torque generated by the wheels to the body of the vehicle. There are two basic methods for transmitting drive torque:
![]() Simplified diagram of a five-link rear suspension. Lower links (yellow) transmit drive torque to the body; upper links (orange) stabilize the axle; a Panhard rod (green) locates the axle laterally. Many GM and Ford cars of the sixties and seventies used a four-link version of this system, omitting the Panhard rod and angling the upper arms toward the centerline of the body, so that they would provide lateral location. (Diagram © 2007 Tennen-Gas; used under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 license) Automakers have developed a number of common methods of locating a live axle. One approach, popular at GM for many years, uses four trailing arms, two above the axle, two below it, angled inward so that they resist lateral motion of the axle. Another approach, used by Buick in the 1960s, uses two lower control arms and a single upper arm, mounted next to the differential, with a lateral track bar (a Panhard rod) or parallelogram linkage (Watts linkage) to limit lateral motion. Both the three-link and four-link layouts are reasonably effective, but the control arms and track bars make the rear suspension more complex, and thus more expensive to build. A simpler third option is Hotchkiss drive. In a Hotchkiss layout, the axle is suspended by a pair of longitudinally mounted semi-elliptical leaf springs, which serve to locate the axle, as well as supporting the weight of the body. The front portion of each spring functions like a trailing arm, transmitting drive torque to the body and resisting squat and axle tramp. The rear portion of the spring acts as a leading arm, resisting wheel hop under braking. The stiffness of the springs also serves to resist lateral motions. By making the springs perform multiple duties, Hotchkiss drive is very simple, and thus very cheap. Since it has few parts, it's also very sturdy, which is useful for heavy-duty vehicles like trucks. ![]() Diagram of a Hotchkiss drive layout. The leaf springs (yellow) act as both springs and control arms, locating the axle and transmitting drive torque to the body. (Diagram © 2007 Tennen-Gas; used under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 license) The drawback of Hotchkiss drive is that while the springs can perform all these various functions, they don't necessarily do them well. The flexibility of a leaf spring limits its usefulness as a control link; if the spring isn't very rigid, it will move in response to the various forces on the axle, rather than resisting them. Making the springs stiffer makes them more effective in controlling axle movement, but it also makes the ride firmer, sometimes uncomfortably so. The more powerful the engine, the greater the problem. Torquey engines like the big-block V8s of the muscle car era can exert so much force on the axle that the only ways to adequately limit axle movement are to (a) make the springs brutally stiff or (b) add auxiliary control arms (popularly known as "traction bars") to help control the axle, which is anathema to the whole rationale for using Hotchkiss drive in the first place. ![]() A U.S. Army Jeep shows off its Hotchkiss-drive suspension. (2006 U.S. government public domain photo; source) One stopgap method, which Chrysler used for many years, is to change the position of the axle on the springs. The spring rate of a leaf spring is proportional to its length. If you move the axle forward, toward the leading ends of the springs, the front section of the spring will be shorter, and thus stiffer, allowing it to better control axle tramp without making the ride harsher. The drawback is that the opposite is also true. The rear portion of the springs (the section aft of the axle assembly) will be softer, and thus less able to resist wheel hop on deceleration. Powerful Chrysler cars of the sixties had good axle control on acceleration, but were prone to violent wheel hop on hard braking, sometimes with harrowing results. Another stopgap, employed at various points by Chevrolet and Ford, among others, is to "stagger" the rear shock absorbers, mounting one ahead of the axle, the other behind it. In this way, the shock absorbers are made to perform double duty, resisting axle tramp. Staggered shocks can be reasonably effective for street cars, but may not be adequate for really high-powered applications like drag racing. Whence the name "Hotchkiss drive?" The layout was popularized by the French firm of Hotchkiss et Cie as early as 1905, devised by engineer Georges Terasse. Few things in the automotive world are ever really new, however, and similar layouts had previously been used by other automakers, including Cleveland's Peerless Motor Company. Nevertheless, the name has stuck, even if it's not entirely accurate. # # #
Comments (2)
Please note that user comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ate Up With Motor, and we accept no responsibility for their content. Publication of a comment does not constitute Ate Up With Motor's endorsement of any opinion, product, or service. Please click here to read our Comment Policy.
Joomla components by Compojoom
|













There's so much tuning that can be done with leaf spring suspensions: adjusting the front-to-back angle of the springs, the spring width, assorted spring pack dimensions, spring-under Vs spring-over, lateral links, etc, etc.
...but by the time you do all of that, you can throw together a much better 5-link with 4 roughly parallel arms and a lateral link for the same price.
The new Dodge 1500s ditched leaves for coils, as it's pretty easy to pull off for light-duty use. Of course, everything old is new again, as 60s Chevys had (significantly more crude) coils as well.
We'll see if the idea sticks this time...