Commentary
Super-iority: Defining the Supercar and Muscle Car PDF Print E-mail

Tags: 1960s | 1970s | American cars | Supercars | terminology

Written by Aaron Severson   
Monday, 27 July 2009 12:34

One of the minor but contentious arguments among automotive enthusiasts and historians is the question of exactly what constitutes a muscle car. Since we'll be talking about several cars of this breed in the coming weeks, we thought we'd give you our take on this issue.

Click here to read more...

1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442 nose low
link
 
Raison D'être PDF Print E-mail
Written by Aaron Severson   
Monday, 16 February 2009 14:51
People sometimes ask me why I'm so interested in cars. This is not always a neutral question -- I have a fair number of friends who disapprove of cars on political or environmental grounds, or who just consider it a little déclassé.

I suppose I don't necessarily seem the type. A lot of gearheads have an intense, emotional relationship with a particular type or genre of cars, the kind some people have with sport teams. Some are collectors, or amateur hot rodders. I'm not. Many are driven by nostalgia, and the desire to capture (or recapture) the things they loved when they were 16. I'm not. I have my own tastes, to be sure, but I've never been one for fannish devotion or nostalgia. While there are cars I might like to own one day, the list is smaller than you might think, and it's not high on my list of priorities.

Which brings us back to the question of why.

To me, cars are primarily a fascinating sociological phenomenon. The auto business is an industry that spans industries -- intersecting everything from manufacturing and design to finance and high technology -- and it serves as a bellwether of the larger social, economic, and political trends of the time. Cars occupy a unique social position; they're driven by fashion and novelty like consumer products, but manufactured and purchased like durable goods, and they carry heavy connotations of class and status. You can tell a great deal about someone by the car they drive, and even more by the cars to which they aspire. For the same reasons, you can tell a great deal about an era by its cars: its fads and obsessions, its anxieties and its dreams. Cars are clay in which the forces that shape our history leave their fingerprints very clearly.

I'm not here to justify or defend the existence of the automobile. The rise of the auto industry has had profound social and environmental consequences, many of which (such as the use of tetraethyl lead in gasoline) are very difficult to defend rationally. As I've said before, interest does not necessarily connote approval. I do believe, however, that it's important to remember that nothing happens in a vacuum, and blindly disapproving of something without considering its context -- or why and how it came to exist -- is a perilous endeavor.

Whether or not you approve of them, cars are an enormously significant social, historical, and economic phenomenon. The central question I set out to answer in each of the articles on this site is why. Why something was designed the way it was; who was responsible for it; why it worked (or didn't); the context for its success or failure; what lessons we can take from it.

That's what interests me, and that's why I'm here.

link
 
Another Empire Down Part 3: Wither Detroit? PDF Print E-mail

Tags: 2000s | bailout | Chrysler | Ford | General Motors | politics

Written by Aaron Severson   
Sunday, 07 December 2008 00:00

It will not have escaped even the casual observer that the companies formerly known as the Big Three automakers -- GM, Ford, and Chrysler -- are in bad, bad shape. GM lost $37 billion in 2007. Ford's operating losses were $2.7 billion overall, but they lost $5 billion on their automotive operations. Chrysler, which is now owned by Cerberus Capital Management, is not obliged to share their annual results (not being publicly held), but they aren't doing a lot better. As of this writing, the three companies are asking for at least $34 billion in federally guaranteed loans, a new bailout.

In this last installment of our series, we weigh in on the state of Detroit.

Click to read more about the current auto industry bailout

1930 Ford Model A Boyce MotoMeter
link
 
Another Empire Down Part 2: The Road Back PDF Print E-mail

Tags: 1980s | American cars | bailout | Bob Lutz | Chrysler | front-wheel drive | Imperial | K-cars | Lee Iacocca | Mopar | politics

Written by Aaron Severson   
Sunday, 30 November 2008 00:00

In 1981, Chrysler had $1.2 billion in federally backed loans and an array of new products. Problem solved? Not exactly. In the third installment of our series on the Chrysler bailout, we examine the corporation's rocky road back to solvency -- and how it ended up on the ropes again less than a decade later.

Click to read more about the aftermath of the 1980 Chrysler bailout

1983 Dodge Aries ad
link
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2